My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-23-1993 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
06-23-1993 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2013 2:32:53 PM
Creation date
8/28/2013 2:30:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JUNE 10, 1993 <br />Schletty pointed out the differences between the <br />previous concept which was approved and the new <br />concept. Those differences are that the cul -de -sac has <br />been shortened, the density reduced, lot sizes <br />increased, tree removal decreased, grading decreased, <br />encroachment on the wetlands decreased. Schletty also <br />reported that additional wetland would be added to the <br />north end of the property to mitigate for any wetland <br />removal on the south. <br />Schletty also reported that the developers would like <br />to get the street in this year. Schletty pointed out <br />that when Sunrise Drive was extended, the street <br />extension project was caught in the 30 -inch snow storm <br />a couple of years ago one day from when asphalt was to <br />be laid. This made the project very difficult, and the <br />developers would like to avoid the same problems in <br />this project. Schletty also reported that the Schletty <br />family had some concerns about the first concept which <br />was approved for Fredrickshaven Second Addition, and <br />that is why a developer is being hired. Anderson <br />Sorenson Construction was hired because the Schletty <br />family was impressed with the quality of their <br />construction, the type of home they build, and their <br />plan for utilization of the area. <br />Carson asked if the proposed homes would have <br />basements. <br />Sorenson replied that some of the homes would have <br />basements, but those details have not been finalized <br />because all of the topography has not been established. <br />Doris Schletty reported that the original concept <br />proposed 13 lots, and that has been reduced to 11. The <br />homes proposed for the area are planned to exceed the <br />value of those recently constructed on Sunrise Drive. <br />Fred Schletty pointed out that it was originally <br />proposed that townhomes be developed on the site, <br />however, this is not what the Schletty family <br />envisioned for the property. Schletty reported that <br />the family hopes that the proposed development would be <br />a flagship part of the community. <br />Carson asked if the road proposed would be private or a <br />City road. <br />Schletty replied that they are proposing a City road. <br />Schletty also reported that when Sunrise Drive was <br />extended, a water connection was established so that <br />this area could be looped with City water main. <br />Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.