Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />SEPTEMBER 9, 1993 <br />well maintained. <br />Keis asked about traffic. <br />Jones reported that traffic to the site would increase <br />slightly, but indicated that traffic to a mini - storage <br />is generally low volume. <br />Keis recommended approval of the amendment to PUD to <br />allow the construction of an additional mini - storage <br />building on the site at 55 East County Road B as <br />requested by Two S Properties subject to compliance <br />with the recommendations of the City Planner as <br />contained in his report dated September 3, 1993. <br />Motion seconded by Drabik. <br />Motion carried 5 - 0. <br />TRUSCOTT Mr. Ron Truscott, 335 Rose Lane, appeared before the <br />PROPERTY Commission requesting approval of a property division <br />DIVISION which would adjust the rear lot line of Lot 6, making <br />Lot 6 larger, and eliminating the "L- shape" to Lot 7. <br />It was pointed out that the proposal conforms to all <br />minimum lot size and setback requirements. <br />Schletty recommended approval of the Truscott property <br />division for Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, St. John's Little <br />Canada Heights, as requested by Ron Truscott subject to <br />the recommendations of the City Planner as contained in <br />his report dated September 3, 1993. <br />Motion seconded by Keis. <br />Motion carried 5 - 0. <br />VARIANCE Mr. Gordie Howe, Masterpiece Homes, appeared before the <br />MASTERPIECE Commission requesting a variance to allow a five foot <br />HOMES sideyard setback on a single - family lot located at 2451 <br />Sunrise Drive. Howe reported that he had discussed <br />with the Planner having the variance occur on the north <br />property line, but would now like to see the variance <br />on the south property line. The reason for switching <br />to the south property line is to save some existing <br />pine trees near the north line. <br />Keis reported that he discussed the variance with the <br />property owner on the south, who indicated that he was <br />happy to see the variance on the north. That property <br />owner is not present this evening, therefore, is <br />unaware of the change being proposed. <br />Page 5 <br />