Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />October 14, 1987 <br />Centerville <br />Road Park <br />Proposal <br />(Cont.) <br />they received a reasonable return on their investment. However, <br />Butler felt that the City should consider that the whole area is <br />capable of supporting office and light - industrial development <br />which would generate about 51.5 million in taxes and as much as <br />5150,000 directly to the City each year. Rather than the expense <br />of a park, the City could be deriving the benefit of 5150,000 in <br />taxes from the property. Butler suggested that there may be more <br />marginal property in the City with a price tag of 52,000 to 53,000 <br />per acre that would be suitable to the development of a recreational <br />facility. However, Butler stated that his firm would do whatever <br />it could to cooperate with the City. <br />Butler also pointed out that reference was made to the 580,000 per <br />acre that he was asking for his property, and pointed out that a <br />property is worth what someone was willing to pay for it. Butler <br />reported that he has firms that are interested in locating in <br />this area, however, AIC has other sites available besides the <br />Centerville Road area. <br />Butler suggested that perhaps the City could still establish a portion <br />of the tax base in the Centerville Road area and swap some land for <br />the more marginal land on the north. However, Butler stated that he <br />would not stand in the way of the City's park proposal. <br />Mark Lendway, past president of the Recreation Asosciation, stated <br />that he wanted to preserve suburban living in Little Canada. Lendway <br />noted that if the Centerville Road area is not developed as a park, <br />it will develop industrially. Lendway was in favor of the proposal. <br />Rod Kleiss reported that he recently moved to Little Canada because <br />of the quality of life in the area. Kleiss reported that his children <br />have become involved in the City's recreation program and this has <br />helped them integrate into the community. Kleiss felt the proposal <br />would further enhance the quality of life in the City and agreed with <br />Lendway that the City will see industrial development on the site if <br />the property is not acquired for a park. <br />Frank Frattalone, son of Dave Frattalone, one of the property owners <br />of the Centerville Road property, reported that his father is in favor <br />of the project and would like to see his agricultural land preserved <br />in park land. Frattalone stated that his father is willing to negotiate <br />with the City on his property. <br />Mrs. Bibeau, another property owner of the subject property, requested <br />that if she sell her property to the City, her house be excluded from <br />the sale as she has willed her house to an heir. <br />Slim Frattalone, property owner on Centerville Road, asked if the City <br />would be purchasing homes along with the park land, pointing out that <br />his homes are for sale and felt they would decrease in value being <br />located across the street from the parking lot for the proposed park. <br />Page -7- Page 227 <br />