07-27-1994 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 14, 1994 Garske asked if the proposal by Suburban Auto met the conditions of the I -P Zoning District. The Planner indicated that stucco on the east and north sides of the building should meet the 50% masonry requirement, and he would do some calculations to determine whether this requirement is met. He was not sure that the amount of outdoor storage met the limitations of the District, but felt it would be close. Also, outdoor storage would have to be fully screened from both the public right -of -way and residential uses. Therefore, outdoor storage would need to be screened on three sides. The ordinance also requires green space coverage of 25 %. The Planner suggested that any CUP approval be conditioned that the I -P standards are met. O'Connell reported that he did not obtain a price for stucco on the entire north side of the building, nor for fencing the outdoor storage on three sides. O'Connell indicated that he would have to obtain these prices and then determine their effect on his proposal. O'Connell asked if he would be allowed to phase in these improvements, should the cost be too great to make all the improvements right away. The City Planner indicated that phasing -in the improvements would be an option. However, the Planner suggested that Mr. O'Connell be held to meeting the standards at this time. If he determines that he cannot, he can come back and discuss it with the Commission. DeBace asked if the 50% requirement applied to the outside skin of the building, or the entire building. The City Planner replied that the 50% requirement applies to the entire building, excluding doors and windows. DeBace asked if stucco on a steel building was acceptable. The Planner stated that the requirement is for full masonry construction or masonry veneer for 50% of the building. Masonry veneer includes stucco. Mr. Garske recommended approval of the Conditional Use 15 Page 24