10-26-1994 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 13, 1994 DeLonais replied that that was correct. Rossez pointed out the City Planner's recommendation for an RB zoning for the property. A maximum of four rental units would then be allowed. The Planner stated that RB allows a maximum of 4 rental units and is the same zoning that the old Little Canada School property has as well as some other properties in the area. The Planner felt that RB was a more appropriate zoning for the area due to the transitional uses going on. There is a mix of residential and low intensity commercial uses in the area. The Planner felt RB was more compatible to the area. Keis asked if the parking would need to be changed as a result of the rezoning or as a result of the addition of living units. The Planner replied that the parking must be added as the result of the addition of living units. If the property were rezoned to RB, one additional living unit could be added, and there would be no need for the addition of parking along the driveway. Keis asked the where this situation stood with regard to the Comp Plan. The City Planner reported that he looked at the land uses in the area in considering this request. Due to the mix of low intensity commercial, RB zoning, and single - family residential, the Planner felt RB was more compatible for the area. Rossez reported that his preference is for R -3 zoning so that two additional living units can be added rather than one. The City Planner reported that even though the rezoning hearing was published as a consideration for R -3 zoning, the Commission could go to RB if desired since it is a step down from R -3. Keis stated that his concern was with reaching ahead of the Comp Plan process. The City Planner again stated that given the mixed uses in the area, it would be his recommendation as part of 6