My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-21-1994 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
12-21-1994 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2014 2:41:21 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 1:29:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />DECEMBER 7, 1994 <br />CUP FOR TWO <br />FREESTANDING <br />PYLON SIGNS - <br />RICE AT C <br />CENTER <br />Mr. Carson recommended approval of the property <br />division for 95 Woodlyn Avenue as presented by Mr. Holm <br />subject to compliance with the recommendations of the <br />City Planner as contained in his December 1, 1994 <br />report. <br />Motion seconded by Schletty. <br />Motion carried 4 - 0. <br />Bob Petroff appeared before the Commission requesting <br />approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a <br />second free - standing sign at the Rice At C Shopping <br />Center. Petroff reported that he is proposing to <br />move the existing pylon to an area east of the driveway <br />on County Road C. That pylon would then be replaced <br />with a new, larger sign. Petroff reported that a <br />similar request had been approved for the previous <br />owners of the shopping center, and the Sign Ordinance <br />had been amended at that time. Petroff reported that <br />the pylons would meet the City's sign ordinance <br />requirements. <br />The City Planner reported that the Sign Ordinance had <br />always allowed a second pylon sign in certain <br />situations. The ordinance was amended a couple of <br />years ago to include standards for the second sign. <br />Davison asked if the signs would be illuminated. <br />Petroff replied that they would be internally <br />illuminated. The new pylon which will be constructed <br />on Rice Street will be approximately 2 feet wider than <br />the existing sign and will be within the 25 foot height <br />limitation. Again, the existing pylon on Rice Street <br />will be moved to County Road C to an area just east of <br />the driveway. <br />Mr. Schletty recommended approval of a Conditional Use <br />Permit to have two free - standing signs at The Rice At C <br />Shopping Center as requested by Bob Petroff based on <br />the findings as outlined by the City Planner in his <br />report dated December 1, 1994. <br />Motion seconded by Carson. <br />Motion carried 4 - 0. <br />2 <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.