Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 23, 2013 <br />clarifies that wholesalers would be required to obtain a tobacco license. <br />The City Attorney reviewed current tobacco store restrictions in the <br />ordinance, and noted that the amendment strengthens the fact that only <br />tobacco may be sampled under the conditions listed in the ordinance. <br />Therefore, no smoking from delivery devices would be allowed regardless <br />of when the license was obtained. The final recommendation adds <br />language restricting the display of delivery devices. <br />McGraw asked about the Clean Indoor Air Act and whether delivery <br />devices were subject to that Act. The City Attorney indicated that he was <br />not sure whether or not these devices were addressed by the Clean Indoor <br />Air Act. Betsy Brock, Ramsey Tobacco Coalition (RTC) stated that the <br />Clean Indoor Air Act in State Law does not address these devices. It is <br />currently up to the individual business owner whether or not to allow the <br />use of delivery devices in their businesses. Brock reported that RTC <br />supports an update to State Law to include these devices. With regard to <br />RTC's comments on the ordinance amendment drafted by the City <br />Attorney, Brock reported that they work with the Public Health Law <br />Center, and the version that RTC forwarded to the City was drafted by the <br />Center. The thought is that any ordinance amendment should not be <br />overly broad. Brock indicated, however, that the City should adopt <br />whatever version it feels is in its best interests. <br />Blesener asked why e- cigarettes are referred to as "electronic ". Brock <br />reported that these devices have a battery in them that heats up the liquid <br />which then turns into a vapor that is inhaled. The use of the battery results <br />in the term "electronic ". <br />The City Attorney reported that the State Legislature has only started to <br />address the issue of delivery devices in that it updated the law to make the <br />sale of these devices illegal to minors. The City would have to option to <br />prohibit the use of delivery devices in public places, or the City could wait <br />and see if the State addresses this issue. <br />The consensus of the Council was to update the Tobacco Ordinance as <br />currently proposed by the City Attorney. The Council asked that the City <br />Attorney do some additional research on the issue of use of delivery <br />devices in public and where the State is on this issue, and report back to <br />the Council. <br />Montour introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -10 -196 — AMENDING CHAPTER 802, <br />TOBACCO PRODUCTS, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE AS <br />RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY CLARIFYING <br />10 <br />