Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 23, 2013 <br />Montour felt that the no parking area should remain, and pointed out that it <br />is a relatively simple process to obtain a parking permit. <br />Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -10 -195 — APPROVING THE REMOVAL OF <br />NO PARKING SIGNS ON THE EAST SIDE OF PAYNE AVENUE AT <br />A DISTANCE FROM THE LABORE ROAD INTERSECTION TO BE <br />DETERMINED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT, <br />WITH THOSE SIGNS TO BE REPLACED WITH NO PARKING <br />SIGNS FROM 2 A.M. UNTIL 6 A.M., AND DECLARING THAT THE <br />COUNCIL WILL CONDUCT REVIEW IN NINE MONTHS TO <br />DETERMINE IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS OR CONCERNS <br />WITH THE CHANGE <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Boss. <br />Ayes (4). <br />Nays (1) Montour. Resolution declared adopted. <br />TOBACCO The City Attorney reviewed a proposed amendment to the City's Tobacco <br />ORDINANCE ordinance relative to the regulation of electronic cigarettes. The Attorney <br />UPDATE reported that the current ordinance already regulates this product; <br />however, it was felt that the ordinance should be clarified relative to the <br />new products that are on the market. The Attorney noted that on a state- <br />wide basis, cities are updating these ordinances. <br />The Attorney then reviewed the areas of the ordinance that he is proposing <br />be clarified as outlined in his October 16, 2013 report. Those include <br />amending the language defining nicotine and lobelia delivery devices to <br />include any delivery device whereby a substance is consumed through <br />inhalation. He felt that the alternate language recommended by the <br />Ramsey Tobacco Coalition was too narrow and short - sighted in his <br />opinion. The Attorney felt that it was his hope that the language as <br />proposed strengthens the City's current ordinance and clears up any claims <br />of "no nicotine" in some of the products at issue. The Attorney also <br />pointed out that delivery devices as defined in the ordinance would not <br />include any product that has been approved or certified for legal sale by <br />the FDA for tobacco use cessation or other medical purpose and is being <br />marketed and sold solely for that approved purpose. <br />The second language amendment provides for a definition of smoking <br />which will include both traditional smoking of tobacco and tobacco <br />products as well as the use of e- cigarettes or vaping. The amendment also <br />9 <br />