Laserfiche WebLink
The ability of the City to direct the implementation steps will be influenced by the <br />organizational resources available to the Development Guide. These steps represent a significant <br />time demand for City Staff and City Council. The demands of the Development Guide will <br />compete with other city business. Organizational changes can be made to apply additional <br />time and resources towards implementation. <br />The Economic Development Authority (EDA) should be given the responsibility for <br />implementation of the Development Guide. This step makes the Development Guide the <br />primary focus of an organization, rather than part of a broader City Council agenda. In <br />addition, State Law gives EDA's specific powers that will apply to implementation. <br />Currently, City Council members serve as commissioners of the EDA. The City must decide <br />if this structure should continue. The short -term advantage of this structure is maintaining <br />continuity of decision making. The City Council will be responsible for all initial decisions <br />relating to the Development Guide. The drawback is the time commitment required of <br />Council members. <br />For the long -term, the City should consider appointing non - Council members to the EDA. <br />This action expands the organizational resources available for economic development. By <br />involving residents and business people, it also helps to achieve the implementation strategy <br />of using public- private partnerships. <br />Staffing is another important organizational issue. Current city staff have the capabilities to <br />undertake the implementation steps described in the Development Guide. As with the City <br />Council, time becomes a limiting factor. Without additional staff resources, implementation <br />demands may divert time from other important city activities and /or not receive sufficient <br />attention. <br />Maximizing the success of the Development Guide will require additional staff resources. <br />These resources can be provided by hiring additional staff or by retaining outside consultants. <br />The use of consulting services is recommended for the following reasons: <br />• Consulting services can be available immediately. There is often a delay in recruiting <br />permanent staff. <br />• A consulting relationship can be time limited. Additional capacity is added for a specific <br />period of time. In this case, many key implementation steps occur in the next 12 to 24 <br />months. After that time, the nature of the relationship can be altered. Full -time staff do not <br />provide this flexibility. <br />• The same dollar amount generally purchases more experience. <br />Implementation [Draft. September 27, 1995] <br />PAGE 30 <br />Page 4 +13 <br />