01-25-1995 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Handicap Stalls. According to State law, one in 25 off - street parking stalls must be devoted to use by the handicapped. While it appears that this requirement has been satisfied, specific handicap stalls should be identified upon the site plan. Circulation. The development is proposed to achieve its access via an existing curb cut from County Road D. Generally speaking, the parking lot circulation system is considered well conceived and functionally efficient. Trash: According to the submitted building elevations, trash is to be accommodated in a screened area between the proposed garage structures. Considering that NSP will not allow the construction of such garages within its easement, an alternative trash handling area may need to be explored. Regardless of location, all trash areas must be screened from view of adjacent properties and public rights -of -way. Setbacks: While the PUD does provide for interior setback flexibility, all perimeter setbacks as required in the base zoning district must be upheld. All buildings have been found to comply with applicable I -P perimeter setbacks. In regard to interior site setbacks, the Ordinance states that no building may be nearer to another building than one -half the sum of the building heights of the two buildings. With building heights of ± 10 feet being proposed, a separation of 10 feet has appropriately been proposed. Utility Plan: A utility plan has been submitted which proposes an extension of sewer and water service to the site from County Road D. As a condition of PUD approval, the utility plan should be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Landscape Plan: Consistent with PUD submission requirements, a landscape plan has been submitted for review. According to the Zoning Ordinance, where any business abuts residentially zoned property, the business must provide landscaping along the shared boundary. To more fully comply with applicable landscaping requirements, it is recommended that an intensification of plantings be provided along the site's eastern boundary. Loading: The site plan does not specify any designated loading areas. As a condition of PUD approval, specific loading spaces should be illustrated. Grading and Drainage: Per PUD submission requirements, a grading and drainage plan has been submitted for review. Such plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Building Height: The proposed office buildings have been found to comply with the maximum 40 feet height requirement imposed in the I -P Zoning District. 3 Page 69