My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-18-1995 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
01-18-1995 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2014 2:23:26 PM
Creation date
1/10/2014 2:22:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor & City Council Page 2 <br />January 13, 1995 <br />Keller Parkway Water Main <br />Project Cost: $240,000 <br />Assessment Rate: $4,600 per lot (18 lots) <br />Assessed Amount: $82,800 <br />City's Share: $157,200 <br />** <br />Street costs are assumed at $45 per foot. This number is <br />highly variable dependent on construction costs and their <br />impact when applied to our Street Assessment Policy. <br />Gilanderi Street has been estimated at $45 per lineal foot. <br />The Engineer's numbers will revise this figure upward. Even <br />after applying our Street Assessment Policy, this road will <br />be very expensive. <br />The Viking Drive hearings should go relatively smooth in that the <br />water main is expected to be favored by all parties. The street <br />is more of a variable in that only four people returned our <br />survey -- two of them favored the street, two of them did not. <br />The City also has an issue to deal with in that costs will be <br />expended to restore the street if Alignment 2 is used that may <br />not be an effective use of our money especially when considering <br />that other portions of the street need attention. At this time, <br />staff favors reconstructing the street where it does not meet <br />standards. <br />The Gilanderi hearing will be very smooth in that the water main <br />is wanted by all parties. (Two owners have had their wells <br />fail!) There is a development deferral issue in this area which <br />has been discussed with that property owner. He has already been <br />assessed for one lot off of County Road B2 and the proposal would <br />be to assess him for two additional lots both of which could be <br />eligible for development deferral. The street project is very <br />difficult and I would be recommending that the City only restore <br />the street similar to its previous section. I would recommend <br />that we upgrade it somewhat to allow it to last longer. However, <br />I believe the costs of upgrading the street section from what <br />presently exists should be a cost assessable to the property <br />owners. My assumption is that this will be a fairly minimal cost <br />especially when compared to the cost of reconstructing the street <br />to City standards. Given that we do not have easements in this <br />area and that adequate right -of -way would be difficult to obtain, <br />I think this is the best course of action from the City's <br />standpoint. I believe the landowners will come to the same <br />conclusion when they compare the costs as well. <br />The Keller Parkway water main hearing should go relatively smooth <br />based on the discussion at the neighborhood meeting. The main <br />issue we can expect is the concern expressed as to why we held <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.