My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-08-1995 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
02-08-1995 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2014 3:07:01 PM
Creation date
1/10/2014 3:04:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
My suggestion to the neighborhood was that they should put <br />together a proposal that has unanimous agreement. It could then <br />be presented to the City Council for your consideration. I made <br />it very clear that the Council would have to look at a number of <br />issues and that acceptance was far from guaranteed. It was also <br />pointed out that should these proposals not be accepted by the <br />City Council, they could be pursued using the association <br />concept. <br />It seems to me that from the City's perspective, it will not be <br />possible to have an improvement which meets our standards. These <br />proposals would seem to merit some attention if the City feels we <br />should be part of the solution. If not, then the association <br />option would appear to be the best. <br />cc: Tom Sweeney, City Attorney <br />Steve Grittman, City Planner <br />Jerry Bourdon, City Engineer <br />Wiley Bennett <br />Pam Sparks <br />Betty & Paul Anderson <br />Jim Manteuffel <br />Trudy Lehner <br />S. Edward Ericson <br />Richard Ericson <br />Mike Gawreluk <br />Page 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.