My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-08-1995 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
02-08-1995 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2014 3:07:01 PM
Creation date
1/10/2014 3:04:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Schact pointed out that the shoulders would address pedestrian and <br />bike safety concerns on the roadway. <br />Karolyn Kingsbury reported that someone from the County informed <br />her that two eleven -foot driving lanes and one five -foot shoulder <br />would work. <br />Schact felt this was misinformation that Kingsbury received. <br />A resident suggested Keller Parkway be made one -way with a separate <br />biking /walking path. <br />A resident asked if Little Canada would be making any decisions <br />within the next six weeks. <br />The Administrator stated that he was not sure how definitive the 6- <br />week schedule was. The Administrator felt it safe to say that the <br />residents have made their concerns known. The Administrator asked <br />which direction traffic should flow if Keller Parkway were made a <br />one -way street. <br />The residents felt traffic should flow from west to east from <br />Edgerton to County Road C. <br />Dr. Keenan pointed out that if Keller Parkway is made one -way and <br />the County then turns it over to the City, the property owners <br />along Keller Parkway would be responsible for paying for <br />maintenance of the street. <br />Schact reported that another question raised by the residents was <br />the impact of the improvement on property values. Schact did not <br />believe that the project would impact property values one way or <br />the other. <br />Hedlund disagreed, pointed out that the 32 foot road section would <br />put 32 feet of pavement between his house and his lakeshore <br />property. <br />Drabik pointed out that the pavement would be within the road <br />right -of -way. Drabik pointed out that the County has the right to <br />come in and improve the road within the right -of -way. <br />Schact replied that that was correct. <br />Chris Drake pointed out that the extra 10 foot width amounted to <br />two football fields of pavement. Drake asked if the Watershed has <br />reviewed the proposal. <br />Schact reported that Watershed permits are not required for County <br />maintenance projects. <br />Drake stated that the additional blacktop will add a lot more salt <br />12 <br />Page 67 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.