My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-1995 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
04-26-1995 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2014 10:31:02 AM
Creation date
2/12/2014 2:55:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />APRIL 13, 1995 <br />affected property owners and the City Administrator to <br />try to come up with a workable solution. However, it <br />has not been possible to resolve the issue. <br />Keis pointed out that either way - street or cul -de -sac <br />- a variance is required. Keis reported that he has <br />talked to the Magnuson's and they are interested in an <br />improvement that will allow school buses to come down <br />the street. The improvement of Jackson Street would <br />allow that as well as improve access for service <br />vehicles. However, the Tima lots would be small and <br />narrow. Keis pointed out that a cul -de -sac at the end <br />of Bluwood would work, but it doesn't appear that a 30- <br />foot paved radius cul -de -sac at the end of Australian <br />would significantly improve access for service <br />vehicles. <br />Knudsen felt that traffic was not an issue since either <br />option would not increase traffic in the area. <br />Keis stated that he would assume that the Jackson <br />Street easement has existed for quite some time and <br />that the property owners in the area were aware of the <br />potential for a street. <br />Kajalski pointed out that Mr. Tima could not petition <br />for a cul -de -sac improvement since there are other <br />property rights involved other than his own. <br />Knudsen pointed out that the street option does not <br />take property away from property owners who do not want <br />to give it up. <br />Keis pointed out that the street improvement will <br />result in the Tima lots being narrow. Keis stated that <br />if access is provided via the street improvement, he <br />would not look favorably on a request for a variance on <br />those lots. <br />Knudsen pointed out that there is currently the <br />potential to divide a buildable lot from the Morelan <br />property, and that remains true if either option is <br />pursued. <br />Steve Morelan replied that that was correct. <br />Fred Schletty stated that he was not in favor of <br />building a substandard cul -de -sac on a substandard <br />4 <br />Page 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.