Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 7, 2014 <br />identified in recent borings will only have an impact relative to utility <br />trenches. <br />Keis asked the impact of the increase project costs on the bond sale. The <br />Administrator reported that the sale of $2,570,000 G.O. Capital <br />Improvement Plan Bonds is scheduled for next Wednesday, February 12th, <br />and the City has the option of selling G.O. Sewer & Water Bonds to cover <br />the additional cost of the project. The Administrator presented three bond <br />issue options for additional dollars of $500,000, $800,000, or $1 million. <br />The Administrator then explained the debt service on an additional <br />$800,000 in bonding, noting that the annual debt service would increase <br />from $190,000 to $246,000. This debt service would be paid from annual <br />depreciation dollars of $300,000; therefore, there would still be <br />approximately $50,000 in depreciation for capital projects. <br />The Administrator reported that in discussing the need for additional <br />financing with Mark Ruff, Ehlers & Associations, he recommended <br />staying under the $1 million amount as an increase of this size may <br />prevent the City's bond rating from going up. The Administrator again <br />noted that the City's depreciation funds can cover debt service. He also <br />noted that the City has completed most of its needed watermain and sewer <br />work. As a result, the Administrator recommended the financing of the <br />additional project costs. Keis asked about the impact to taxpayers. The <br />City Administrator noted that the bond debt service would be shown as a <br />levy, which would then by eliminated by Council action, and the debt <br />service paid for from depreciation. There would be no increased tax levy <br />to property owners, and there would be no increase in sewer and water <br />rates to cover the cost of debt service on the bonds given the City is <br />already funding depreciation at this level. <br />Keis stated that the issue for him is how he justifies the cost to citizens. <br />He noted that the project proposed is about the same size or less than that <br />of similar -sized cities. He also pointed out that the cost of the project will <br />not result in increased taxes to property owners. Montour also noted that <br />efficiencies will be gained in that the Public Works Department and the <br />Parks Department will be combined into one location. <br />The City Administrator noted that the existing Public Works facility is <br />7,700 square feet, the Parks Shop is 4,000 square feet, and the City is <br />using a portion of the 4,900 square feet in the former Roseville Plumbing <br />property for a total of approximately 13,000 to 15,000 square feet of <br />current Public Works /Parks space. The Administrator noted that under <br />current conditions, the City still has some equipment stored outside. He <br />further reported that the Public Works needs study done by Oertel in 2000 <br />estimated the need for 10,200 square feet. The Administrator pointed out <br />3 <br />