Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 12, 2014 <br />purpose, for example, a gas station/convenience store or a drug store. The <br />ordinance establishes a maximum display area, which the Clerk <br />recommended be 50 cubic feet based on the survey of the General <br />Tobacco Sales license holders. Other provisions require that the tobacco <br />display area be located in the immediate vicinity of the business's primary <br />point of sale, prohibits an entrance door directly to the section of the store <br />displaying tobacco, and prohibits a separate point of sale for tobacco sales. <br />The City Attorney also included Language that clarifies the Council's <br />flexibility in acting on applications for Tobacco Licenses. <br />At this point in the meeting, Tom Duray, owner of 2526 Rice Street, <br />appeared before the Council on behalf of Kelly Ortiz who wishes to rent <br />the property at 2526 Rice Street for a convenience store that sells tobacco <br />products. Duray noted that the space consists of 1,200 square feet, and <br />Mr. Ortiz would have 720 square feet dedicated to convenience items and <br />480 square feet to tobacco sales. Duray reported that Mr. Ortiz submitted <br />a letter listing the tobacco products that he would sell. Duray noted that <br />the Council has requested information substantiating Mr. Ortiz's claims <br />that a minimum of 40% of the square footage of the store would have to <br />be dedicated to tobacco sales in order to qualify for discounts. Mr. Ortiz <br />submitted information from the tobacco supplies; however, it was not <br />apparent from this information that there was a 40% display area <br />requirement. Duray reported that Mr. Ortiz based this understanding on <br />the way his brother operates a tobacco store in White Bear Lake. Duray <br />also noted that it would be difficult to make a profit with merely a <br />convenience store, and the ability to have 40% of the floor area dedicated <br />to tobacco sales would help to make the business venture successful. <br />Duray noted that the City Attorney recommended against the creation of a <br />third class of tobacco license in his report. Duray asked if there was <br />enough support on the Council for increasing the number of Tobacco <br />Store Licenses to three if there are restrictions on that license restricting <br />sales to only the products that Mr. Ortiz has listed in his letter. <br />Keis pointed out that the business model proposed by Mr. Ortiz would not <br />qualify for a General Tobacco License given the amount of floor area that <br />would be dedicated to tobacco sales. Keis also noted that the City placed <br />a limit on the number of Tobacco Store Licenses in order to control the <br />number of these stores in the City. Keis did not feel that the City needs to <br />legislate whether Mr. Ortiz has a good business plan or not. He asked if <br />the City could issue another Tobacco Store License restricting the sale of <br />products to those proposed by Ortiz. The City Administrator felt it would <br />be difficult for the City to enforce a restriction on the types of products <br />that could be sold in a tobacco store. McGraw pointed out that other cities <br />have had problems relative to the types of products that tobacco stores can <br />4 <br />