Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 12, 2014 <br />sell. McGraw stated that he preferred to not create a situation where the <br />City could run into problems. <br />Montour stated that he has never been in a convenience store that had 40% <br />of its space dedicated to tobacco stores. Montour stated that it was his <br />opinion that the Ortiz proposal was for a tobacco store that sells some <br />convenience items. He felt that the options would be for the City to <br />increase the number of Tobacco Store Licenses or for Mr. Ortiz to change <br />his business plan and live under the conditions of the General Tobacco <br />Sales & Display License. Boss agreed. Montour agreed with previous <br />comments that there is a need to fill store fronts in Little Canada, but he <br />indicated that Ortiz business model did not work for him. I -le noted that <br />the City already has two tobacco stores. <br />McGraw pointed out communications that the Council received from <br />residents opposed to the addition of another tobacco store in the City. <br />The City Administrator noted that City staff receives a lot of inquiries <br />about the availability of Tobacco Store Licenses as well as interest in <br />establishing hookah shops in the City. The Administrator noted empty <br />store fronts, noting that the City must consider the types of businesses it <br />wants to attract to the community. The Administrator indicated that he <br />read the information submitted by Mr. Ortiz from the Phillips Tobacco <br />Company, and did not find a provision wherein a discount would he <br />granted if the store had 40% of floor space dedicated to tobacco sales. <br />The Administrator indicated that the likelihood is that discounts would he <br />granted based on sales volumes. <br />Duray again indicated that Mr. Ortiz was basing his information on the <br />operation of his brother's tobacco store. He also noted that he contacted <br />surrounding cities, none of which have classes of tobacco licenses nor <br />restrictions on the number of these licenses. Duray felt this made it <br />difficult for a business owner to compete with stores in surrounding <br />communities. Duray also pointed out that this building space has been <br />vacant for almost a year. <br />Montour suggested that Mr. Ortiz consider changing his business plan, and <br />pointed out that he would still likely qualify for discounts if his sales <br />volume meets the required criteria. Duray acknowledged that the 50 cubic <br />feet being recommended as the maximum under the General Tobacco <br />Sales & Display License was better than the 25 cubic feet first discussed. <br />Keis stated that he supported the ordinance amendment as proposed for <br />the General Tobacco Sales & Display License, and was not in support of <br />adding another Tobacco Store License. Montour agreed and suggested <br />5 <br />