Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 25, 2007 <br />Duray asked if the business license would be renewable. The Planner <br />replied that it would be. <br />The Planner noted that his next recommendation under The IUP chapter is <br />that the outdoor storage area be limited to no more than 50% of the size of <br />the property. The Planner stated that he first considered tying outdoor <br />storage area to building size or a combination of building size and lot size. <br />However, it was his opinion that it was better tied to lot size. <br />Keis pointed out that tying outdoor storage to building size would <br />encourage more accessory buildings to be constructed which would <br />consequently increase the amount of outdoor storage allowed on the site. <br />Pechmann suggested a combination of building and lot size, with a <br />provision that the amount of outdoor storage allowed be the calculation of <br />the lesser of the two. <br />The City Planner pointed out one of the Lee Rossow lots, which is a very <br />large lot with a small building. Basing the amount of outdoor storage on <br />lot size would result in a lot of outdoor storage on this property. <br />The Planner pointed out that three is no restriction on the amount of <br />outdoor storage allowed in the I-1 District at this time. The amount of <br />outdoor storage allowed in the I-P District is a maximum of 25% of <br />building area, based on a recent ordinance amendment. Prior to that <br />amendment, 75% of the building area was the standard. <br />The Planner noted his recommendation that outdoor storage shall not <br />occupy any portion of the yard between the building line and the adjoining <br />public street. Keis questioned the practicality of this limitation for those <br />properties with no backyards or corner lots. McGraw indicated in these <br />cases to state that 50% of the lot area can be used for outdoor storage is <br />somewhat misleading. The Planner indicated that 50% may not be the <br />right number, or the ordinance could be reworded to highlight that outdoor <br />storage being is allowed in the lot area behind the building. <br />The Planner suggested that there are essentially two ways to address the <br />outdoor storage allowance. Those are based on percentage of total lot area <br />or percentage of building square footage. For properties without rear <br />yards or on corner lots, there would be some location modification. <br />Allan suggested that if outdoor storage is calculated based on building <br />size, the City might get some larger buildings in the park. If the soils are <br />poor, Allan indicated that she would support metal buildings with some <br />upgraded exterior treatment such as EFIS. <br />4 <br />