Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 24, 2007 <br />Ms. Allan inhoduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOL UTION NO. 2007-IO-270 -DENYING THE VARIANCE FOR <br />ACCESSORY BUILDING SIZE REQUESTED BY PRECISION TREE <br />BASED ON THE FACT THAT THE APPLICANT WILL BE <br />CONSTRUCTING A BUILDING ADDITION RATHER THANAN <br />ACCESSORY BUILDING, AND BASED ON THE FACT THAT <br />THERE IS NO HARDSHIP PRESENT TO WARRANT GRANTING A <br />VARIANCE FOR ACCESSORY BUILDING SIZE <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (5). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Mr. Montour introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOL UTION NO.2007-10-271- DENYING THE VARIANCE FOR <br />BUILDING MATERIALS REQUESTED BY PRECISION TREE <br />BASED ON THE CITY PLANNER'S DETERMINATION THAT THE <br />BUILDING MATERIALS PROPOSED MEET CITY CODE <br />REQUIREMENTS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by McGraw. <br />Ayes (5). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />The City Attorney recommended that the Board of Adjustments and <br />Appeals adopting the findings of fact presented by the City Planner that <br />support the Precision Tree Variance for outdoor storage. <br />Mr. Montour inri•oduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOL UTION NO. 2007-10-272 -ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF <br />FACT PRESENTED BY THE CITY PLANNER IN SUPPORT OF <br />THE VARIANCE FOR THE PRECISION TREE VARIANCE FOR <br />OUTDOOR STORAGEAS OUTLINED INRESOLUTIONNO.2007- <br />10-269 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Keis. <br />Ayes (5). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />