12-13-07 Planning Comm. Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 13, 2007 Stock reported that Heffron currently has a tattoo parlor in St. Paul, is experienced in the business and runs a great operation. Duray asked that the Planner review his tattoo parlor study dated January 4, 2006. The City Planner reported that as part of that study, a survey was done of some Metro cities to determine the regulations they had in place for tattoo parlors. The Planner indicated that most cities allow tattoo parlors with some regulation and licensing requirements. Based on these survey results, the City Planner indicated that he is recommending that tattoo parlors be allowed in the PUD District only and subject to licensing. The Planner noted that the PUD District is dominated by commercial uses with only a minimum amount of residential uses. The Planner felt that by limiting tattoo parlors to the PUD District, the City would gain a lot of control. He also noted that he is recommending a separation from any residential uses, and the Press Gym location would meet that requirement. The Planner indicated that in addition to serving no more than two clients at a time, he is recommending that no more than two tattoo parlor licenses be in place at any one time. Duray suggested that the City begin with one tattoo parlor license initially similar to how massage therapy was handled. Once the City has established a ri•ack record with this type of business, it can consider any additional license requests that may be submitted. Duray asked if the State regulates the age at which someone can obtain a tattoo. Heffron reported that the County does. A person can obtain a tattoo at 16 with a parent's or guardian's permission. Heffron reported that he does not tattoo anyone under the age of 18 regardless. The Planner noted that his recommendation includes compliance with all County regulations applicable to this type of business. Duray suggested that a background check be required on the licensee. Socha asked what other types of business licenses require background checks. The City Clerk indicated that liquor licenses and massage therapy licenses are some examples where background checks are required. Hall pointed out that criteria would have to be established that would be used to measure when a license would be denied based on the results of a background check. Hall felt that without the appropriate criteria for denial, which must be directly related to the specific license, requiring a background check could be problematic. Barraclough asked about Heffron's liability should a tattoo be botched or there be a health issue. Heffron reported that customers have to sign liability waivers. Barraclough noted that most tattoo business is word-of- mouth, therefore, if there are problems at a tattoo parlor, there will be no customers. Heffron agreed, and indicated that 90% of his business is -2-