My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-07 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
11-08-07 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2008 1:43:58 PM
Creation date
5/1/2008 1:35:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iVIINIiTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />OCTOBER 11, 2007 <br />Benning reported that it is their intention to preserve the existing trees at the <br />north end of the property. Chuck P1owe, engineer for the developer, <br />reported that they have not done a tree preservation plan. A diagram has <br />been prepared showing all the existing trees on the property. However, it <br />would be their plan to custom grade each lot, rather than clear cut the lots. <br />Then as houses are determined, each individual lot can be graded to <br />preserve as many trees as possible. Plowe reported that the entire tree area <br />on the north end of the property would be undisturbed except for a small <br />infiltration pond that will be constructed. <br />Helmeke asked who would own the pond. Plowe reported that the City <br />would be granted a maintenance easement over the pond. <br />Duray asked if all lot size and setback minimums would be met. Benning <br />replied that they would and noted that the lots are approximately 86 feet <br />wide. Duray asked the proposed value of the homes. Benning reported that <br />they would have a 1,000 to 1,200 square foot footprint. Values are <br />estimated in the $440,000 to $510,000 price range. <br />Helmeke asked if the cul-de-sac could be pushed further to the east to make <br />the lots deeper. Benning replied that it could be shifted somewhat as long <br />as doing so did not negatively impact the Hanson property. <br />Duray asked if there was any other potentially developable land that is <br />impacted. Benning replied that only the Hanson property has development <br />potential. He noted a previous concept that was submitted for a'700 foot <br />cul-de-sac resulted in two additional lots for the Steinert property. <br />Knudsen stated that he was not prepared to grant a Variance to cul-de-sac <br />length unless the result in the view of the City there was an improvement to <br />the overall development. The City Planner noted that the standard that <br />needs to be considered is the reasonable use of the property, and noted that <br />there is some flexibility in that standard. <br />One of the property owners in the area asked about the platting of Outlot A. <br />The City Planner noted that a platted outlot is not a buildable lot and <br />typically has an intended future use. Sometimes outlots are platted for <br />ponds. In this case, Outlot A is being platted to provide future development <br />access to the Hanson property. The Planner noted that the City's <br />Subdivision Ordinance does not allow for the platting of remnant properties <br />unless there is some future use. <br />Ray Hanson, 699 LaBore Road, described his property located on the east <br />side of the Steinert property. He noted that he actually owns two parcels, <br />one that is a long very narrow strip that was deeded over to him when <br />Ontario Road was developed. There have been some title issues with this <br />-14- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.