Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 23, 2008 <br />Allan expressed concern as to how the Code Enforcement Officer will be <br />able to determine whose outdoor storage belongs to whom. Blesener <br />noted that there are only a handful of properties that will have adequate <br />land to offer off-premise outdoor storage. Blesener also noted that <br />properties offering and properties wanting off-site outdoor storage will <br />have to be compliant with the new code standards. <br />The City Planner indicated that for the business leasing the off=site <br />outdoor storage, his/her property would have to be compliance with <br />today's code. The property on which the off-site outdoor storage is <br />located would have to be compliance with the new code. Montour pointed <br />out that the properties have to be code compliant for the previous 12 <br />months as well. <br />Michael Mergens, representing Valor Enterprises, pointed out the long <br />process that it has taken to get to this point. Mergens stated that it is time <br />to get the code amendment enacted and the moratorium lifted so that <br />everyone can move on. Mergens pointed out that the Valor property could <br />have been sold a year ago if this ordinance had been in place. Mergens <br />urged the Council to adopt the amendment so everyone could move on. <br />Bruce Kath, Kath Oil, indicated that he has three semi-ri•ailers on his Rice <br />Street property that he uses for storage. Kath indicated that these trailers <br />are moved only about 12 to 15 days each year. The Code Enforcement <br />Officer noted that the Kath Rice Street site is zoned B-3, therefore, <br />outdoor storage is not allowed. <br />Stanke asked if his cargo containers are grandfathered in. The City <br />Administrator indicated that if they show up on the Stanke CUP, then they <br />would be allowed. Otherwise, the Stanke CUP would have to be amended <br />to include the cargo containers. <br />Blesener noted that whatever ordinance amendments are passed would not <br />apply to any property with a CUP in place. However, if a property owner <br />needs to amend their CUP or applies for a new CUP, compliance would be <br />required with the new code. <br />Stanke indicated that his present CUP does not reference trailers or storage <br />containers, although he has had them on this property since 1979. <br />Montour indicated that if the amendment is passed outdoor storage would <br />be allowed up to 60% of the property area. However, this does not mean <br />that properties will all be able to achieve that percentage. The 60% is the <br />maximum only after building area, setbacks, landscaping, required <br />parking, etc. is deducted from the total property area. <br />