My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05-09-2016 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2016
>
05-09-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2018 3:21:24 PM
Creation date
5/12/2016 1:41:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/09/2016
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />d. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections <br />providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or <br />F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, <br />improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. <br /> <br />e. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must <br />have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the <br />proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural <br />deficiencies. <br /> <br />f. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City <br />street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital <br />Improvement Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider <br />developer-financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies. <br /> <br />g. The LOS requirements in paragraphs 1. to 4. above do not apply to the I- <br />35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, <br />interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County <br />and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to <br />determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must <br />determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic <br />contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. <br />The plan also must examine financing options, including project <br />contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other <br />properties, that contribute to traffic at the interchange. <br /> <br />h. The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination. <br /> <br />Traffic generated by the relocated veterinary hospital is within the capabilities of the <br />transportation system. CSAH 34 is a minor arterial road and is capable of handling <br />traffic from the proposed relocation. Rice Creek Animal Hospital currently operates in <br />the Spirit Hills Center, a fully developed multi-tenant retail center, without traffic issues. <br /> <br />5. The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. <br /> <br />The proposed veterinary hospital is served with adequate and safe water supply. The <br />Spirit Hills Center is a fully developed multi-tenant retail center served by an 8” <br />watermain and adequate water supply. <br /> <br />6. The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary <br />sewer system <br /> <br />The proposed veterinary hospital is served with an adequate and safe sanitary sewer <br />system. The Spirit Hills Center is a fully developed multi-tenant retail center served by <br />an 8” sanitary sewer and adequate sanitary system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.