01/12/1994 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

4. The proposed use may be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. 5. The fiscal impact of the proposed use provides benefit to the community. 6. Traffic generated by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. While citizen input on this matter is certainly welcome, it must be recognized that the above cited criteria, not citizen opinion, must serve as the basis for decision making in this matter. Attached for reference: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Recommendation - Site Location - Detailed Site Location - Comprehensive Plan Policies - Development Location Policy - Land Use Plan - Sewer Plan - Sketch Plan - Phasing Plan - Cost Summary The City's 1987 Comprehensive Plan suggests urbanized residential growth upon the subject property by the year 2010. In this regard, the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The City must, however, determine whether the requested rezoning fulfills the cited rezoning evaluation criteria and whether urban growth in this area of the City is appropriate at this time. While the availability of privately funded utilities provides some justification for approval of the requested it is only one of several items of consideration. The primary justification to approve or disapprove the rezoning is the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the City proposed rezoning to be acceptable, it should be approved the fulfillment of the following: certainly rezoning, requested finds the only upon • The City approve amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Plan/MUSA and Sewer Plan). • The necessary Comprehensive Plan amendment is subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council. 2