Laserfiche WebLink
4. A temporary cul-de-sac is provided at the southern terminus of <br />Street A. <br />u) <br />5. The City Engineer provide comment/recommendation in regard to a <br />street width requirements. <br />6. An access permit is obtained from Anoka County Highway to <br />accommodate the proposed County Road 89 access. <br />7. The submitted grading and drainage plan is subject to review <br />and approval by the City Engineer. <br />8. The submitted utility plan is subject to review and approval <br />by the City Engineer. <br />9. The Park Board provide recommendation in regard to park and <br />trail dedication. <br />10. All wetlands are delineated by a person recognized as <br />qualified to the DNR or Army Corps of Engineers. <br />11. All wetland related recommendations offered by the Army Corps <br />of Engineers, Rice Creek Watershed District, and City Engineer <br />are satisfactorily met. <br />12. If the subject development is to occur in phases, a phasing <br />plan is submitted. Such plan shall be subject to City <br />approval. <br />13. Comments from other City staff. <br />ISSUES ANALYSIS <br />Rezoning <br />As noted previously, a rezoning of the subject site from R, Rural <br />to R-1, Single Family Residential is necessary. <br />Judgement Criteria. In review of rezoning requests, the Planning <br />Commission and City Council should consider its possible adverse <br />effects. Judgement should be based upon, but not limited to, the <br />following factors: <br />a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the <br />specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be <br />consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. <br />b. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and <br />future land uses of the area. <br />