10/13/1993 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

i+.C.T- 1 2- _ - T U 1 .1-3. The applicant pursue variances for the following: a. Cul-de-sac length in excess of 500 feet (Section 303, Subd. 1(8) . b. Irregular lot shapes (Section 100..08, Subd. 6 (3). 3. City Officials determine the acceptability of the proposed lot widths of Lots 6, 7, and 8. We would recommend approval of these lots based on the physical constraints of the site. 4. All site wetlands are established as easements within abutting lots. To the extent possible, a.i significant trees on the subject site are to be preserved. 6. The proposed wetland mitigation is subject to review and comment by the Rice Creek Watershed District. 7. The City Engineer provide comment in regard to drainage and utility issues, including the need for easements. 8 The proposed subdivision is subject to review and continent by the Park Board in regard to appropriate trail and park dedication. 9. Driveways for Lots 7 and 8 are placed so as not to infringe upon required drainage or utility easements. This item should be subject to further comment by the City Engineer. 10. Comments from other City staff, ISSUES ANALYSIS Su i.viE__2 Proc ao nc , It had been the applicant's original intent to process the attached sketch plan as a preliminary plat. Because numerous preliminary plat submission requirements had not been received (i.e., grading and drainage ps.s.r_, utility plan, street cross sections, etc.), staff has recommended that the subdivision plan be considered as a sketch plan. Rather than potentially deny a preliminary plat request due to lack of information, it is believed that sketch plan consideration would be beneficial both to the City and applicant at this time (prior to further financial investment). As part of forthcoming preliminary plat consideration, all applicable submission requirements, as outlined in the City's Subdivision Ordinance, should be met. 2