My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01-11-2007 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter
>
Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Packets
>
2007 Packets
>
01-11-2007 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 5:43:01 PM
Creation date
9/8/2017 11:33:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
1/11/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 Charter Commission <br />July 13, 2006 <br />Page 5 <br />DRAFT <br />X74 <br />15 MOTION by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Storberg, to request copies of <br />176 information related to Charter inquiries and legal opinions when available. <br />177 <br />178 Commissioner Trehus added the Commission should also get a summary of verbal opinions. <br />179 <br />180 MOTION carried. <br />181 <br />182 The Commission asked Commissioner Dahl to write a letter to the City requesting that <br />183 information. <br />184 <br />185 Accessible Projects Process Update (Refer to Lines 450-451 in April 13, 2006 Minutes) <br />186 Neighborhood Concerns - Commissioner Trehus advised everyone received a memo outlining <br />187 an option to get the neighborhood behind a road reconstruction project. He noted it is a rough <br />188 draft and believes the process would work. It basically adds an option for neighborhood input. <br />189 He suggested having a joint meeting with the Council to discuss this or send them a <br />190 recommendation. <br />191 <br />192 Chair Warren stated she does not fully understand the current process for road reconstruction so <br />193 she does not know if this is the optimal solution. She suggested getting the City Boards or teams <br />194 of expertise involved in the process. <br />195 <br />196 Commissioner Carlson stated he is not supportive of the proposal. He gave his reason why and <br />197 stated the proposal would make it harder to build roads within the City. <br />198 <br />199 Commissioner Trehus stated this is just the first step to get neighborhoods together before City <br />dollars are spent on a project. This is a very rough draft and it would need revisions. <br />01 <br />202 Chair Warren stated she would like the optimal process within the City for this issue. She stated <br />203 experts are needed to create that process. <br />204 <br />205 Commissioner Handrick suggested an informational meeting with staff to better understand the <br />206 current process. <br />207 <br />208 Commissioner Carlson asked if the previous memo was sent to the Council and if a response was <br />209 received. <br />210 <br />211 Commissioner Trehus stated he did not send a memo with the options that were outlined at the <br />212 last meeting. <br />213 <br />214 MOTION by Commissioner Trehus, seconded by Commissioner Dahl, to invite the City <br />215 Engineer and Community Development Director to make a presentation on the current road <br />216 reconstruction process. <br />217 <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.