My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/08/1976 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1976
>
06/08/1976 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 3:39:29 PM
Creation date
9/29/2017 2:02:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
06/08/1976
P&Z Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />- Page Two - June 8, 1976 <br />Mr. Starr said in the rural area, 10 units per square mile is suggested <br />in order to prevent premature dem"f`r1'g' °for sewer service. The suggested <br />criteria for this rural arep is 1) adopt the restrictive soils zoning <br />provision, 2) adopt a 5 acre minimum lot size and 3) limit denisty to <br />one unit per 10 acres. <br />This could be adopted for an interim period and could be modified if <br />soils can support the on-site systems. This should be worked out in the <br />overall plan. <br />Mr. Kelling felt this would bejust for an interim period, it might be <br />necessary to call a moratorium for a while but not for long. This would <br />have to be very short range. <br />Mr. Karth asked if this statement saysthere could be no more commercial <br />zoning? Mr. Barton said, No. <br />Mr. Starr said the soils map should be incorporated as part of Ordinance <br />#56. This would tell a builder if certain soils exist based on the map, <br />an on-site system wouldn't work. If the builder can document proff that <br />the system can work, then the area would be allowed to develop. <br />The general feeling of the Planning and Zoning Board was there is no <br />problem with this requirement as long as there is the possibility of <br />allowing variances to this requirement. <br />Mr. Kelling said due to experience Ordinances are being changed and <br />modified at the time in order to meet the needs of the people and to <br />conform to the changes that are occuring. <br />Mr. Starr said the PCA is developing new standards for the installation <br />of septic systems. He thought these should be completed by early Fall. <br />The City should continue to use the current regulations until these <br />regulations are completed. The City would then be required to adopt <br />the regulations by reference. <br />There was discussion on the installation of on-site systems and the <br />life expectancy of such systems. Mr. Barton said if a system failed, it <br />would have to be replaced. Mr. McLean asked who picked up the cost for <br />the inspection program they are proposing. Mr. Barton said this cost <br />would be set up in the Ordinance on a fee basis. Mr. Starr said some <br />communities require pumping annually. This is done on a contract bads <br />and put on the tax rolls as a levy. <br />Mr. McLean wondered if this is an answer and Mr. Barton said it is one <br />way of being reimburesed for the cost of this operation. <br />Mr. Kelling pointed out that a properly installed system would not create <br />pollution according to the University of Minnesota. The containment is <br />within 25 feet of the system. <br />Mr. Starr said this is just a suggestion, The PCA standards will be the <br />ones all communities will have to follow. These standards will have a <br />public hearing before adoption. <br />Mr. McLean asked if these standards are just for the Metro area and Mr. <br />Barton said they would apply State wide. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.