My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/19/1969 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1969
>
11/19/1969 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2022 8:30:09 AM
Creation date
9/29/2017 3:11:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
11/19/1969
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(2) <br />411 A 9:00 p.m. the public hearing for Acton. Construction Company was continued <br />from the September meeting. Mr. Paul Miller again asked for blanket rezoning <br />of his property on 35E and Cedar Street. He stated that he 4as unable to ob- <br />tain buyers for the property unless it was zoned commercial. Mr. Miller <br />introduced his professional planner who stated that the most logical use for <br />the property was light industry, and that`if someone wants to build something <br />they want to build it tomorrow" and did not want to wait for rezoning prodedures. <br />The Planner recommended that the property be rezoned to commercial so Mr. Miller <br />could seek out clients that are interested in his land. <br />Many of the Board members explained to IvMr. Miller and the planner that they did <br />not approve of blanket zoning because then the Board and the Council lose control <br />over the type of industry that can be put on a certain parcel of land. Mr. <br />Karth thought that Acton would be forcing adjoining property owners to go into <br />commercial zoning unless they avould pitt in some type of buffer zone around their <br />property. Ur. Stanley stated that although Mr. Miller's intentions are very <br />good he could sell property to a buyer who in turn would sell it for something <br />undesireable. <br />Ivir. McLean emphasized that we must have something more specific es to plans <br />and specifications in order to recommend rezoning to the Council. He suggested <br />that the matter be discussed with the Village Planner before any decision .is <br />made. Mr. )Miller and his planner also thought this was a very good idea and <br />were confident that something could be worked out with Mr. Van Housen. <br />Mr. Jester moved to continue the public hearing for Acton Construction Company <br />until December 17, unless notified otherwise, so that both Mr. Miller and Mr. <br />McLean would have time to confer with Mr. VanHousen, to determine necessary <br />specifications of these plats. The Attorney All take care of the legal <br />specifications. The Board recommends that the Council also continue their <br />scheduled public hearing. Seconded by Mr. Karth. Motion carried. <br />A representative from Meyers Outdoor Advertising and Mr. Dick Paisley from 3M <br />Company came forward to offer further revisions in the proposed Sign Ordinance <br />The Board added some of these requests to the submitted amended ordinance. <br />The Public Hearing for NJ Saddle Club was opened at 10:12 p.m. without a' <br />representative present from the Club. All of the legal requirements had been <br />met and the affidavits filed with the Clerk. The request was to consider <br />the petition of Northwest Saddle Club, Inc. for a Special Use Permit to park, <br />maintain, and occupy as a residence for a caretaker for said Northwest Saddle <br />Club a mobile home according to law on the property owned by NW Saddle Club <br />on Birch Street. <br />According to hearsay the NJ Saddle Club property has been vandalized several <br />times and they feel by having a caretaker live in a mobile home 24 hours a <br />day this situation would be alleviated. The Board felt that to grant this <br />permit would be inconsistent with, precedent of the Board in that they have <br />only granted special use permits for hardship cases in the past. Granting <br />this one permit would establish a precedent for exactly the type of trailer <br />situation the Village is trying to avoid. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.