Laserfiche WebLink
SPECIAL WORK SESSION August 25, 2009 <br /> APPROVED <br /> for charter commissions was passed in 1947. The commission is further requesting an additional <br /> $1,500 for the remainder of 2009 to fund attorney fees relating to the commission's efforts to <br /> frame and amend. Further,based on discussions at the joint meeting, the commission requests <br /> that the 2010 budget for the commission be set at $8,500 (to fund operating expenses, attorney <br /> consulting fees, frame and amend legal fees and strategic planning). The council could delineate <br /> that funding if they so choose. The commission requests that the items be added to the agenda <br /> and voted upon at the next regular council meeting. Ms. Sutherland also provided some written <br /> information for review relative to what the city has spent on legal fees for review of a proposed <br /> charter amendment as well as some information on costs gathered from other cities that have <br /> looked at tax cap amendments to their charter. <br /> It was confirmed that the budget request for 2009 is $6,070.35 (that includes the initial $1,500 <br /> appropriated in the approved budget). <br /> A council member noted that the 2010 budget isn't yet determined and is still well under <br /> consideration so the commission's request really becomes a part of that discussion. The council <br /> could appropriately make a determination on the 2009 supplemental request though. A council <br /> member noted that those council members present at the joint meeting agreed to put the matter <br /> on the September 14, 2009 council agenda based on discussion at the September 8 work session. <br /> It was noted that staff has not yet reported back on the council's questions and directives related <br /> to the charter commission audit and that information should be fully reviewed and understood as <br /> the council looks at the charter's budget. Staff was directed by Council Members Stoltz and <br /> Reinert to report on the charter commission audit directives at the September 8 council work <br /> session. Commissioner Sutherland requested that the council receive Charter Attorney Karen <br /> Marty's response to the charter audit as part of the background information for that item. <br /> Regarding the budget request for 2010, a council member recommended that the discussion <br /> should include how the council and commission will be working together as much as possible in <br /> formulating amendments, leaving the costly legal work to be done on a product agreeable to both <br /> groups. Is that an approach that is agreeable to the commission? Ms. Sutherland suggested that <br /> the concept of strategic planning could be helpful in developing collaboration. A council <br /> member suggested that it would be helpful to include more itemization on the $8,500 2010 <br /> budget request, as city departments would do. <br /> A council member requested a copy of Ms. Sutherland statement (as it was in writing)to be <br /> written into the record. She replied that she would provide the portion relating to numbers. <br /> The council returned to the overall 2010 budget discussion. It was noted that staff is <br /> recommending holding the budget at the 2009 tax rate (approximately$8,700,000). To move <br /> from the $8,400,000 proposed to that larger figure should probably be done through changes in <br /> the workforce reduction area to avoid reductions in services. The schedule was clarified—the <br /> maximum levy will be submitted to the state in mid-September after that and until mid- <br /> December the work will continue to finalize a budget. <br />