Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 7, 2016 <br />DRAFT <br /> 5 <br />capacity, a transportation study would be a required element of the project review. The 179 <br />roadway would be built for industrial use and the use isn’t particularly unique. Job 180 <br />expectation is at about 120 and, if tax increment is included, there would be wage 181 <br />requirements. The mayor asked about proximity to the NorthPointe Development and 182 <br />Mr. Grochala explained an area of about 300 feet between this project and that housing 183 <br />development; he added that his biggest concern about this proposal is how it would merge 184 <br />with other uses in the area. The mayor asked about what type of development the city 185 <br />could expect at this site and Mr. Grochala said the area has always been guided as 186 <br />industrial but he didn’t necessarily expect a building this size – it is about twice the size 187 <br />of Warehouse Alternatives. 188 <br /> 189 <br />Mayor Reinert said impact on residents is always his biggest concern but the site is also 190 <br />directly adjacent to the freeway. He’s heard that industrial was expected but perhaps 191 <br />smaller facilities. There will decidedly be a traffic impact. Mr. Grochala said that the 192 <br />traffic question really needs to be evaluated. The council discussed possibilities for 193 <br />screening/berming. Mr. Grochala said he would also urge caution on opening up the 194 <br />window to allowing outdoor storage (such as with trailer trucks); it must be carefully 195 <br />considered. 196 <br /> 197 <br />Staff reported that they anticipate a fast track schedule will be proposed by the developer. 198 <br />Staff was directed to work on the concept of screening and berming and the best plan 199 <br />possible for the site. 200 <br /> 201 <br />5. FEMA Flood Plan Update- Community Development Director explained that 202 <br />this project of updating FEMA flood plain maps actually started in 2009. The process 203 <br />has resulted in a lot of calls to city hall from residents experiencing changes that impact 204 <br />their property designation. The city adopted its new flood plain maps in 2015 and staff is 205 <br />still working with WSB on certain elements of the update. Mr. Grochala discussed how 206 <br />the rise in some flood plains impacted areas of the city, including properties adjacent to 207 <br />lakes. There are elevations that are determined by zone only and since mortgage 208 <br />companies are doing more prudent review, there have been lots of communications with 209 <br />property owners about flood insurance. City staff is providing information to residents 210 <br />based on map data available. When the mayor asked what changed that caused the map 211 <br />amendments, Mr. Grochala said it’s basically that more data is available to update maps. 212 <br />He explained that he is still working with the city engineer to get more clarification on the 213 <br />changes and there will be a report to the council from Katy Thompson of WSB. 214 <br /> 215 <br />Mayor Reinert remarked that there are lots of people concerned about additional costs. 216 <br />Mr. Grochala explained that the situation is based on data and the ability to predict more 217 <br />flooding more accurately. Staff is responding to calls and giving information and 218 <br />possible ways to save on increased costs and they are looking at options to study further if 219 <br />there is possibility of change. It’s important to remember that you don’t necessarily want 220 <br />to tell people they are outside of the flood zone if they are actually in danger of being 221 <br />flooded because then they won’t have insurance. 222 <br /> 223