My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/14/2018 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2018
>
03/14/2018 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2022 4:26:27 PM
Creation date
4/12/2018 11:14:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
03/14/2018
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />March 14, 2018 <br />Page 4 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />o The City would allow shrinking the footprint of the development to increase <br />distance/buffer from the existing single family homes <br /> Mr. Root’s statements to staff <br />o Turning townhomes, on west and north side, into cottage homes would be <br />appropriate <br />o County Road J and Hodgson plan had more commercial <br />o Reduce apartment buildings by 10-20 units <br /> Mr. Stimpson’s statements <br />o Agrees with the suggestions regarding cottage homes and more commercial <br />o Not opposed to the apartment building but rather how it is orientated on the <br />property, suggests orientating it differently so it does not feel like a wall <br />o Suggests using the senior housing towards 694 as architectural guidance <br /> Mr. Laden acknowledged measuring 30 feet to roof line <br />o Mr. Grochala stated measurement is normally from grade to roof peak, <br />measuring to the peak may add 5 feet <br /> Mr. Stimpson asked for clarification on site amenities <br /> <br />Chair Tralle opened the floor for resident comments <br /> Mike Witham, 211 Woodridge Lane <br />o Concern around density because of traffic <br />o Original plan stated 50/50 mix <br />o Overall concerns to be pedestrian friendly <br />o Appreciate efforts shifting plan to the east <br />o Improved plan over the previous plan <br /> Kevin Oberg, 165 Woodridge Lane <br />o Would be nice to have buffer <br />o Not concerned about apartment building, more concern around senior facility <br /> Jim Rabuse, 233 Woodridge Lane <br />o Concern around quality of the buffer <br />o Does not see good location for apartments <br /> Dan Kvinge, 201 Woodridge Lane <br />o Planning operation going better than the past <br />o Concerned about the density <br />o Appreciate open meeting and advancement of planning for the City <br /> Judy Eagan, 238 Shlavin Court <br />o Apartment building is not appropriate for the location <br />o Concerned about traffic study that will take place and how the results will be <br />communicated <br /> Mr. Grochala stated the process <br />o Appreciate the time and efforts of the board <br /> <br />C. Public Hearing: Distinctive Elements Tile and Design Conditional Use Permit <br />and Site Plan Review <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.