Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />March 14, 2018 <br />Page 4 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />o The City would allow shrinking the footprint of the development to increase <br />distance/buffer from the existing single family homes <br /> Mr. Root’s statements to staff <br />o Turning townhomes, on west and north side, into cottage homes would be <br />appropriate <br />o County Road J and Hodgson plan had more commercial <br />o Reduce apartment buildings by 10-20 units <br /> Mr. Stimpson’s statements <br />o Agrees with the suggestions regarding cottage homes and more commercial <br />o Not opposed to the apartment building but rather how it is orientated on the <br />property, suggests orientating it differently so it does not feel like a wall <br />o Suggests using the senior housing towards 694 as architectural guidance <br /> Mr. Laden acknowledged measuring 30 feet to roof line <br />o Mr. Grochala stated measurement is normally from grade to roof peak, <br />measuring to the peak may add 5 feet <br /> Mr. Stimpson asked for clarification on site amenities <br /> <br />Chair Tralle opened the floor for resident comments <br /> Mike Witham, 211 Woodridge Lane <br />o Concern around density because of traffic <br />o Original plan stated 50/50 mix <br />o Overall concerns to be pedestrian friendly <br />o Appreciate efforts shifting plan to the east <br />o Improved plan over the previous plan <br /> Kevin Oberg, 165 Woodridge Lane <br />o Would be nice to have buffer <br />o Not concerned about apartment building, more concern around senior facility <br /> Jim Rabuse, 233 Woodridge Lane <br />o Concern around quality of the buffer <br />o Does not see good location for apartments <br /> Dan Kvinge, 201 Woodridge Lane <br />o Planning operation going better than the past <br />o Concerned about the density <br />o Appreciate open meeting and advancement of planning for the City <br /> Judy Eagan, 238 Shlavin Court <br />o Apartment building is not appropriate for the location <br />o Concerned about traffic study that will take place and how the results will be <br />communicated <br /> Mr. Grochala stated the process <br />o Appreciate the time and efforts of the board <br /> <br />C. Public Hearing: Distinctive Elements Tile and Design Conditional Use Permit <br />and Site Plan Review <br />