My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03-25-2019 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2019
>
03-25-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2021 1:08:47 PM
Creation date
10/16/2019 11:51:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
03/25/2019
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan 55 November 2018 – WSB Project No. 02988-500 Action No. Actions identified by Issue Category Additional Issue(s) Addressed Goals Addressed Policies Addressed 19 Incorporate neighborhood stormwater planning and education into street reconstruction program. Water Rate & Quantity 3.1.1 3.1.1E 20 Evaluate Revisions to Road Design Standards including: • Reducing minimum pavement widths • Ribbon curbs and curb cuts with roadside swales, infiltration, and biofiltration • Use of pervious pavements Water Rate & Quantity 3.9.2 3.1.1 3.9.2A 3.1.1.A 21 Continue to implement the RMP: • Create a wetland bank to provide replacement opportunities for development or roadway projects. Water Rate & Quantity Wetland Management 3.9.2 3.1.1 3.3.1 3.9.2C 3.1.1C 3.3.1C 3.3.1D 3.3.1E Continue to participate in pre-permit application meetings with the RCWD and USACE that support the collaborative permitting process implemented through RCWD Rule and the USACE’s Programmatic General Permit that implements the Special Area Management Plan. Water Quality 3.9.2 3.9.2B 22 3.2.2 3.2.2C MONITORING, MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION 23 Work with RCWD and VLAWMO to develop a long-term monitoring program to accompany RMP implementation and to evaluate quantitatively the strategy’s long-term environmental and cost benefits. NA 3.10.1 3.10.1E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, INFORMATION & EDUCATION 24 Participate with other public agencies and organizations on education and outreach efforts. NA 3.11 3.11.1A 3.11.1B 3.11.1C 3.11.2B 3.11.2C 3.11.2D FINANCING 25 Pursue grants through the RCWD Grant Programs to assist in the funding of projects that will reduce the impact of existing development on local water resources. NA 3.12.2 3.12.2A 26 Pursue funding support from VLAWMO for projects in the Amelia Lake and Wilkinson Lake subwatersheds. NA 3.12.1 3.12.2B 27 Review and evaluate funding sources for surface water management including ad valorem taxes, development charges, grants, and user fees. NA 3.12.1 3.12.1A 3.12.1B 28 Update and continue to implement Trunk Surface Water Management Fee System. NA 3.12.1 3.12.2A 29 Pursue funding through Federal and State grant opportunities NA 3.12.2 3.12.2A 5.2 Implementation Costs The City will use funds generated from its General Fund and Surface Water Management Charge as the primary funding mechanisms for its implementation program including maintenance, repairs, capital projects, and studies. Additionally, for applicable projects, the City will apply for grant funding through state, federal and watershed opportunities as they become available. Priority actions in the RMU-specific implementation plan as defined in Appendix D are listed in Table 5-24. The total estimated cost to implement this plan, including City-wide and all RMU Subwatershed Areas, is $5,597,000 over 10 years. These costs vary based on the year. It should be noted, that some of the costs should be recovered through surface water management impact fees collected in conjunction with development. Most of the City-wide costs are related to maintenance of the existing system and satisfying the programmatic requirements of the City’s NPDES permit. Phase 1, 2, and 3 of the Northeast Lino Lakes Comprehensive Stormwater Plan make up a majority of the infrastructure costs in relation to the high priority Peltier RMU. It is further assumed that once the more detailed RMU Subwatershed Plans are completed, more of the infrastructure costs will be defined so it can be included in developer fees for each area.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.