06/10/2020 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Road) and CR J (Ash Street) and approved by Council in 2007. The Comprehensive Plan states that all development in the area must be consistent the Master Plan. The proposed Lyngblomsten development is consistent with the Master Plan as detailed in this staff report and is therefore, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Environmental Assessment Worksheet An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is not warranted. The threshold computation of unattached units (20 cottage homes) and attached units (1n�L+�0 n - 96 IL +35 AL) is less than one. Wetlands A small 0.28 acre wetland exists in the northwest corner of the site. A wetland delineation was completed by Kjolhaug Environmental in June 2018. A WCA Notice of Decision was issued by RCWD on October 3, 2018. The wetland is not part of the Wetland Management Corridor and formal recorded conservation easement documents or declarations are not required. The City will instead require a minimum 25 foot wide wetland buffer and signage via Council resolution. There are no wetland impacts. Floodplain There is no FEMA floodplain on site. Adjacent Jurisdiction Review As discussed, the City of Lino Lakes, the City of Shoreview, Anoka County and Ramsey County have spent several years working with the applicant on right-of-way needs and access points to the development. Adequate right-of-way is being dedicated along both CSAH 49 and CR J. Anoka County and Ramsey County are analyzing turn lane options along these corridors that are outside the scope of the Lyngblomsten project. During the PUD Concept Plan Review, the City of Shoreview commented the development should be served by City of Lino Lakes utilities. This has been accommodated. Shoreview also expressed traffic and access concerns along CR J and recommended a traffic study be required. A traffic study has since been completed and distributed to all agencies. The City also noted the need for trail connections along which has been addressed. Overall land uses are compatible. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the land use application on February 6, 2019. Overall comments were positive. The Board recommended attention be given to the stormwater pond infiltration, wetland buffer signs, landscape buffers and screening. 31