My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/03/1997 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1997 Park Board Packets
>
11/03/1997 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:52:25 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 11:50:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
11/03/1997
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes <br /> Park Board Meeting <br /> October 6, 1997 <br /> PARK DEDICATION FEES: <br /> Marty Asleson wrote a memo to the Park Board Members on park <br /> dedication history. He said several years ago, before the Parks <br /> and Trails Comprehensive Plan, all minor subdivisions were <br /> reviewed by the Park Board as they came up. There were many <br /> questions at that time concerning park land needs and where the <br /> needs for this land should be place in the city. <br /> After the comprehensive plan was developed we had a much better <br /> understanding of the open space and trail needs . Thus, it was <br /> suggested that the minor subdivisions be periodically taken to <br /> the Park Board for review in situations where in the estimation <br /> of staff, there would be no impact on the comprehensive plan. In <br /> situations where there was an impact, or a question of impact, it <br /> was decided to bring these issues to the Park Board immediately. <br /> As you know, there are not a great many of these that this <br /> happens with. <br /> This issue of minor subdivision review was taken to the Park <br /> Board and approved some years ago. <br /> n <br /> Kim asked if this meant they do or do not come before the Park <br /> Board. Barry said the city takes the $500 fee and it does not <br /> come before the board. <br /> Barry then read a memo from Mary Kay dated September 30, 1997 . <br /> (See minutes for memo) Paul said he still had questions about <br /> commercial dedication. Barry said maybe the new director could <br /> research this and give the members an answer to this issue in the <br /> future. <br /> Joe asked if the Park Board could be informed when dedication <br /> money is taken in. <br /> Paul had questions about commercial dedication. He wanted to <br /> know why the city does not get more dedication for commercial <br /> development . Sharon said we do not want to discourage commercial <br /> development . Pam wanted to know if it was a state or city <br /> ordinance . Barry responded state. Paul said commercial <br /> dedication should help give the Park Board money to spend on park <br /> development or upgrading parks . <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.