My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/04/1998 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1998 Park Board Packets
>
05/04/1998 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 2:55:16 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 2:57:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
05/04/1998
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes <br /> Park Board Meeting <br /> n <br /> April 6, 1998 <br /> George verified with Rick the exact location and that it included <br /> all of Marshan Park. He clarified that they were not looking to <br /> name a park, but to change the name of an existing park. <br /> Sharon stated that if they were to do that they must go through <br /> the proper channels and guidelines . Pam agreed, explaining that <br /> the name of that park was there before the multi-family housing <br /> came forward because the single family homes were already <br /> established. She assumed that the developer had to do a land <br /> dedication. <br /> Paul expressed sorrow for the family, but felt it was poor timing <br /> to change the name of the park now, seeing as it was already <br /> developed. He felt it was unfortunate that they were put in the <br /> awkward position of denying Mr. Hokanson' s request, especially <br /> since he had always been so cooperative with the City. Paul felt <br /> somewhat undecided and hoped they could come up with something <br /> else that they could do in honor of his grandson. Jeff and Pat <br /> both agreed with Paul . Pat stated that it was very unfortunate <br /> but believed there could be something else done other than <br /> renaming a park. <br /> George stated that he was ambivalent because the park did already <br /> have a name and the three acres is not separate from the adjacent <br /> park property. Sharon asked if Mr. Hokanson is developing the <br /> three acres and suggested that he could name a street after his <br /> grandson. Pam stated that the streets for that development are <br /> already in. <br /> George explained that the Park Naming Resolution did come about <br /> because of this request, and they did need a set policy for <br /> future requests . Jeff indicated that there are memorial plaques <br /> now available to be put in parks and maybe that is an option. <br /> Rick explained that he had already spoken with Mr. Hokanson about <br /> this and he was not receptive to the idea. <br /> Pam stated that if they approved this request, they would be <br /> setting themselves up for problems in the future. She <br /> acknowledged that Mr. Hokanson did not live in the area and, even <br /> though he was developing it, she felt firm about not allowing the <br /> change in name. <br /> George explained that they did have a precedent set in the City <br /> in which a toy structure was donated and a memorial plaque was <br /> placed next to it in the park. Possibly this could be recommended <br /> for Mr. Hokanson. <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.