02/02/1998 Park Board Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

City of Lino Lakes Park Board Meeting January 5, 1998 ($15, 000) ; (b) two half-ton pickup trucks with plows ($55, 815) ; (c) replacement of Shenandoah play structure ($18, 000) ; (d) the Elm Street trail ($60, 000) ; and (e) a copy machine ($13, 500) . By way of follow up, Rick noted that the Birch Street Trail was completed at a total cost of $10. 97 plus 30% engineering cost for a total of $14 .26. This figure is consistent with customary estimates of between $15 and $20 per lineal foot. George pointed out that seal coating of trails, which was not approved by Council, should be stressed in the future . Original trails are now approximately six years old and should be on a maintenance program. Rick agreed, stating that a significant number of Lino Lakes' trails are in need of seal coating within the next year or two, and the $15, 000 proposal would have put the trail system on a satisfactory annual maintenance program. Pam asked if the Shenandoah play structure would have to be removed due to liability. Rick stated that the department would be looking at removal of this play structure in the spring, adding that it will be unfortunate that there will no longer be a play structure for the children. Joe suggested that the neighborhood be notified prior to the structure' s removal . George suggested a neighborhood meeting. George asked about the $60, 000 Elm Street Trail item. Rick stated that he is gathering additional information regarding the status of this trail . FRIENDS OF THE PARK UPDATE : Barry stated that this group did not meet in the month of December; therefore, there is no update on activities at this time. OLD BUSINESS• Clearwater Creek Business Center: Rick explained that in September of 1996 Council approved the final plat for Clearwater Creek 2nd Addition. Unfortunately, following completion of site grading, staff discovered that installation of the 15-foot wide trail along the rear lot lines of those lots west of Tele Lane would result in the removal of a number of large deciduous trees, including some significant oak trees . This issue was then discussed with the developer, and it was agreed that the trail would be relocated to avoid as many of r� the larger trees as possible. On September 22, 1997, Council denied acceptance of the proposed relocation of this trail due to infringement upon the required 6