My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/04/1991 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1991 Park Board Packets
>
11/04/1991 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2021 10:24:02 AM
Creation date
7/23/2021 1:55:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
11/04/1991
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PARK BOARD MINUTES <br />OCTOBER 7, 1991 <br />land value", and how do we determine raw land value? He also asked <br />if all areas are the same for land value. Don Volk explained that <br />land value in urban service areas is more valuable than those areas <br />that will never be serviced by sewer and water. George Lindy asked <br />if that situation wouldn't be covered in the density part of the <br />formula. <br />Don Volk suggested going back a year and averaging out previous <br />land sales. <br />George Lindy feels that the board is expected to be able to provide <br />the most accurate land cost estimates to developers up front, to be <br />fair to us and the developer. <br />Ken Johnson says that it looks like the only real standard we have <br />to fall back on is the assessed value. "It looks more <br />standardized." <br />Marty Asleson noted that some cities have an appraiser to determine <br />land value. John Baumann asked what it costs and Ken Johnson wanted <br />to know how accurate the appraisals are. Marty Asleson says that <br />he has seen two different appraisers come up with two widely varied <br />appraisals on the same property. He commented that is what the <br />County Assessor is, an appraiser. <br />George Lindy asked if the council was concerned with the $10,000.00 <br />minimum being relevant every year. He asked Don Volk how frequent <br />he thought the value of land would change warranting an increase in <br />the per acre figure, and how long have we been using $10,000.00 per <br />acre in our formula. Mr. Volk doesn't see a big change in property <br />value very often and explained that we have just started using that <br />$10,000. per acre figure recently. <br />Mr. Lindy also expressed that he cannot see a big increase in <br />property values in the next 2 or 3 years, unless something in the <br />economy changes. He feels that if the cost of land has to be <br />reviewed in 2 or 3 years, "isn't that the Park Board's main <br />responsibility, to be cognizant of that figure all the time? " <br />He also sees no problem in a review each year, "not to change it". <br />But staff could apprise the board of it and provide an accurate <br />minimum value per acre. <br />George Lindy asked if we are over complicating the situation by <br />trying to get into an indexing system. Don Volk feels personally, <br />yes. He likes the basic formula, if land is purchased for less than <br />$10,000.00 per acre we use the $10,000.00 figure, and as time goes <br />by and land values increase we will use the $10,000.00 less <br />frequently. He says the only "glitch" is the few parcels of land <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.