My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/04/1991 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1991 Park Board Packets
>
11/04/1991 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2021 10:24:02 AM
Creation date
7/23/2021 1:55:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
11/04/1991
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� PARK BOARD MINUTES <br />OCTOBER 7, 1991 <br />that developers now own, they may subdivide, and the value of land <br />has increased, although he doesn't see this happening very often. <br />Ken Johnson asked if there should be an either/or situation in the <br />formula, going according to what was paid for property or by the <br />assessed value? Don Volk pointed out that farm land is assessed at <br />a lower value than buildable lots, for example. <br />George Lindy asked again if the board couldn't review the minimum <br />per acre as an annual procedure, and would it be too difficult to <br />change it? Don Volk replied that the council doesn't want to go <br />through this all the time, but "no" it isn't real difficult to <br />change it, just a matter of going through the "process". The <br />"process" would require a first and second reading at the council, <br />then publishing of the document, then publishing of the ordinance, <br />and then 30 days after that it becomes effective. <br />George Lindy commented that we need to "simplify this, it doesn't <br />look like there is a good way to project accurate land cost, so the <br />only way would be to review it annually or bi-annually, to make <br />sure we're still in the ball park." <br />Ken Johnson says this sounds "self defeating", the idea was to come <br />up with a formula we don't have to keep changing, now we're going <br />back to reviewing it each year. "It seems to me there are two <br />points here, 1. is that base price is $10,000.00 per acre, we need <br />to look at how have land values changed in comparison to the <br />current price indexes, can that figure be tied into it?, or if they <br />(the developer) haven't had their land appraised in recent years, <br />make them get a current appraisal, or get an appraiser for the <br />City." Don Volk said it may be worth having an appraiser. He says <br />their rates vary from $200.00 to $1200.00, but it would be an <br />accurate appraisal. He added "once the land changes hands, and the <br />new owner does not develop it, that's what it's worth." <br />Don Volk said that he can go back to the council and explain the <br />concerns that have been discussed tonight, and put it on the agenda <br />for a second reading. George Lindy asked how difficult it would be <br />for staff to review the land values once a year. Don stated this <br />could be done easily because all the land value figures are in a <br />computer. <br />Ken Johnson commented that he would like to see an appraiser used <br />in determining land value, as the value could depend on the demand <br />for the property. <br />,.� Don Volk pointed out that on the three Certificates of Real Estate <br />Value that were handed out, all were sold for less than the <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.