02/22/1995 Park Board Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

`~ CITY OF LINO LAKES PARK BOARD MEETING MOEMAY, DECEMBER 5, 1994 George told Pastor Kendrick that the Park Board was an advisory group and the City Council will make the final decision. Pastor Kendrick asked when this would go to the City Council. Marty responded that he would try to get it on the agenda for the December 12, 1994 meeting. UPDATES AND OLD BUSINESS: George stated that some of the other agenda items may require lengthy discussion, so thought Item D. should be taken up first because Kirk Corson was there for presentation. D. Marshan Townhomes: Marty presented this issue to the Park Board. The reasons for this issue, to be revisited, is there may be a reconfiguration of the plat, and the shoreland adjacent to the trail has been under discussion. At this time Kirk Corson did not have data to support any changes, to the original concept; he does however want to discuss the proposed changes before anything else happens. The issue of the shoreland will be brought up in the sense of ,.� whether the Park and Recreation Board would support the idea of a publicly controlled lake frontage. The issue of a canoe launch has been discussed. Anoka County Parks would support the idea of a publicly owned canoe access. The question of how this relates to park dedication is very nebulous at this time since Hokanson is still working on development requirements with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Marty said a public access canoe launch falls within the goals and objectives of our Comprehensive Plan under the section of Parks/Open Space Acquisition/Development and the Preservation of Significant Natural Resources. He continued by saying this access would definitely be a good opportunity to make available to the residents as a whole a recreational opportunity using a significant Lino Lakes natural resource. Marty continued by saying the details would need to be worked out at a future date if the Board feels it is worth pursuing. Mary Kay gave background information on this issue. She said this issue was already before the Park Board and park dedication was recommended and accepted and then it went to the Planning and Zoning Board. Before the meeting the developer withdrew his request to address some concerns that were brought out in the staff report. Mainly the overall design of the development and some questions the staff had relating to a new shoreland management ordinance that they are working on. (which needs to be 3