|
1
<br />1
<br />1
<br />DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
<br />July 11, 1990
<br />the approved preliminary plat. This should allay any fears
<br />council members may have about housing quality.
<br />Without the rezoning a variance would be required for lot
<br />size as they do not cover an area of 12,825 square feet.
<br />The lots that would require a variance are listed below:
<br />1. Lot size: 12,825 square feet.
<br />Non Conforming Lots:
<br />Block 1: All Lots (1 -13)
<br />Block 2: Lots 2,3,4,5,6,7,14,15,16,17,18,19
<br />Block 3: Lots 2,3 ,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,15,16,17
<br />Block 4: All Lots (1 -4)
<br />2. Lot Depth: 135 feet
<br />Non Conforming Lots:
<br />Block 1:
<br />Block 2:
<br />Block 3:
<br />Block 4:
<br />All Lots (1 -13)
<br />Lots 1,2,20
<br />Lots 1,6,8,9,10,11,12,13
<br />All Lots (1 -4)
<br />3. Lot Width: 90 feet
<br />Non Conforming Lots:
<br />Block l: Lots 3,4,5,6,7,8,12,13
<br />Block 2: Lots 1,2, 3,4,5,6,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,19
<br />Block 3: Lots 1, 2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,12,14,16,17
<br />Block 4: All Lots (1 -4)
<br />The board felt that by issuing a variance in this instance
<br />would be setting precedence.
<br />Mr. Chase added that the problem is economic to Mr. Carlson.
<br />Mr. Chase felt that other things could be completed to this
<br />plat to eliminate the need for a variance consisting of this
<br />many lots. The design review board has to look at approval
<br />on the basis that the applicant meets the six findings of
<br />fact.
<br />MOTION: Mr. King moved to recommend to the city council
<br />denial of the variance request, Application #90 -31 for
<br />PineRidge Subdivision. The design review board cannot find
<br />that this application meets the six findings of fact. John
<br />Bergeson seconded the motion and the motion was approved
<br />unanimously.
<br />MOTION: Mr. King moved that the city council reconsider and
<br />approve the Rezoning Application #90 -14 for PineRidge
<br />Page 2
<br />
|