Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />July 13, 2022 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br /> <br />Ms. Larsen said that for a community center style clubhouse that fifteen stalls (15) <br />would be the minimum requirement. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden asked if on-street parking is permitted on Watermark Way. <br /> <br />Ms. Larsen said that on-street parking is permitted on Watermark Way. <br /> <br />Mr. Root asked what is compelling the applicant to provide a parking area for the <br />public park and proper landscape buffer on the lot line that is adjacent to a single- <br />family home. <br /> <br />Ms. Larsen further stated that all comments from Staff must be addressed prior to <br />building permits being released. <br /> <br />Chair Tralle asked if, “buffer” is the new word for, “berm”. <br /> <br />Ms. Larson said no, not necessarily. She further stated that for screening purposes, a <br />buffer could be a berm, a six (6) foot fence, a variety of tree species, or a combination <br />thereof. <br /> <br />Mr. Root made a MOTION to recommend approval of Watermark 5th Addition PUD <br />Final Plan/Final Plat subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion was <br />supported by Mr. Vojtech. Motion carried 5 – 0. Chair Tralle abstained. <br /> <br />C. 6966 and 6970 Lake Drive Lot Combination Variance <br /> <br />Ms. Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. <br /> <br />The property owners of 6966 & 6970 Lake Drive, Robert and Carol Stanek, <br />submitted a Land Use Application for a variance from State and City zoning and <br />shoreland requirements to combine the two contiguous (2) nonconforming lots. <br />Staff recommended that the 6966 and 6970 Lake Drive Lot Combination Variance <br />not be granted. <br />Board Comments <br />The board discussed why the subject lots needed to be combined back in 2013, when <br />the Staneks purchased them, because the Lots were zoned (R-1). <br />Ms. Larsen stated that the subject lots would have still been considered <br />nonconforming because they were not served by sanitary sewer. <br />Mr. Grochala said that if two adjacent parcels were in separate ownership, then they <br />could be built on if they met the minimum requirements for nonconforming use.