My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/27/2005 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2005
>
06/27/2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2014 4:07:30 PM
Creation date
1/17/2014 12:38:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/27/2005
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Marketplace PDO Amendment, page 2 <br />S tablfor the entire Marketplace development as a part of Ordinance 16 -01 will need to be slightly <br />ished <br />odified. <br />Architectural Design Standards <br />Ordinance 16 -01 which rezoned this site to PDO (Planned Development Overlay), also established the design <br />standards for the buildings on site. The applicant is now proposing what staff feels is a significant improvement <br />to the overall design of the multi -tenant buildings. Staff does have a couple of concerns in regards to the <br />elevations, which are addressed below. The final design for the multi- tenant buildings will need to replace the <br />existing elevations within the design standards. Minimal changes will also need to be made to the text attached <br />to Ordinance 16 -01. None of the changes will be substantive changes, rather just correcting portions that refer <br />to the old building designations (A -F) and then designating which sections will apply to each of the new <br />building lots. <br />Building Materials/ Elevations <br />The elevations attached to this report are a result of ongoing discussions between staff and the applicant. <br />Improvements were made to the previously approved design, including more brick and variation to the facade <br />accomplished by stepping out the ends of the buildings. However, staff is recommending conditions of <br />approval that require the cornice be EIFS or better with flashing used only to maintain the integrity of the <br />cornice, not as an architectural element. <br />IllVhe Planning and Zoning board also recommended conditions requiring that the sides of the towers on each end <br />f the building protrude from the building face equidistant to that already provided on the front of the building, <br />which has been incorporated in the revised elevations. <br />Landscaping <br />The landscaping proposed is significantly conforming to the previously approved landscape plan, however the <br />Planning and Zoning board has recommended a condition that all landscaping areas be irrigated, including <br />plantings and sod areas. The landscaping for the single user buildings will need to be addressed at time of Site <br />Development Plan Review. <br />Parking <br />Parking Factor <br />Parking Requirement <br />Spaces Required <br />Retail C <br />At least one (1) off street parking <br />space for each two hundred (200) <br />square feet of floor area. <br />30 <br />Retail D <br />At least one (1) off street parking <br />space for each two hundred (200) <br />square feet of floor area. <br />30 <br />Future Retail <br />At least one (1) off street parking <br />space for each two hundred (200) <br />square feet of floor area. <br />30 <br />Pad Sites <br />Will be determined at time of Site <br />Plan Review <br />N/A <br />Parking Provided <br />92 <br />- 56 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.