Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />1. Sketch plan submission and pre - application meeting with the applicant prior to <br />submission of a preliminary plat. This meeting would lay out the review schedule, <br />submission requirements and fees associated with the preliminary plat application. Staff <br />may identify design concerns identified in review of the sketch plan. <br />2. City Staff Development Review. Following the submission of the preliminary plat <br />application, City staff shall meet to review the application to determine if the application <br />is complete. The application shall be reviewed against City checklist and development <br />regulations to determine completeness. Staff shall also outline initial review comments <br />pertaining to plat design or changes to the plat that would be required to receive approval. <br />The applicant would be notified of the completeness of the preliminary plat application <br />and if changes need to be made. <br />3. Advisory Committee Review. Upon completion of a preliminary plat, staff shall outline <br />a review schedule and public hearing date that would allow the City' s advisory <br />committee, as well as outside agencies (i.e., Rice Creek Watershed, VALMO, Anoka <br />County, DNR, etc.) the opportunity to review and comment on the preliminary plat prior <br />to public hearing at the Planning and Zoning Board. The review schedule should be <br />arranged to allow for the Planning and Zoning Board to have complete information on the <br />preliminary plat prior to making the recommendation to City Council. <br />4. Following Planning and Zoning Board recommendation, the City Council should review <br />and take action on the preliminary plat. The City Council should review the same <br />application as the Planning and Zoning Board. <br />5. Prior to or in conjunction with the submission of the final plat, the City may wish to <br />S require a final version of the preliminary plat and working plans (i.e., grading, drainage, <br />landscaping, utilities) that reflect all the recommendations and conditions of approval. <br />This would help to improve the City's ability to track approval history and enforcement. <br />Premature Subdivisions <br />The City will need to review and update the language for premature subdivisions. This section <br />of the ordinance presents findings that may be used to justify denial of a subdivision application. <br />Performance Standards <br />Through the comprehensive planning process and recent reviews, numerous suggestions were <br />offered as to subdivision performance standards that should be considered to create better <br />neighborhoods. The following is a partial list that may be expanded through the ordinance <br />review: <br />1. Greenways Protection <br />• Residential Clustering/Conservation Development <br />• Permanent Open Space Protection - Conservation Easements <br />• Define Open Space/Large Lots /Common Open Space <br />2. Tree Preservation Standards <br />3. Landscaping Standards <br />City of Lino Lakes Page 2 Project Definition — Ordinance Updates <br />