09/09/2002 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • • JADT Addition Page 4 of 10 Circulation. The proposed circulation is considered well conceived and is integrated into the overall circulation system proposed for the subdivision. One minor concern that exists in regard to site circulation is the temporary dead -end parking arrangement on the west side of the site. To address this concern, a temporary turn- around should be provided at the western terminus of the parking area (either on site or within Lot 3). Lot Size and Setbacks. While the Planned Development Overlay designation can provide flexibility from the strict terms of the Ordinance, the requirements of the underlying SC, Shopping Center District are considered an appropriate guideline. The lot and building performance standards for properties within the SC District are listed below. * Flexibility requested Within SC zoning districts, a 50 foot setback is required from arterial streets. As shown on the preliminary site plan, a 30 foot principal building setback has been proposed along I -35. At 2.3 acres in size, the subject property also fails to meet the minimum 3 acre lot requirement imposed in the SC District. The PDO section of the Ordinance does state however, that perimeter setbacks can be established by applying the setback requirements of the surrounding district or can be related to the height of the buildings. While both the proposed setback and lot area deviations can be accommodated via the PDO, City officials should determine their acceptability. Required Proposed Lot size minimum 3 acres 2.3 acres* Lot width minimum 100 feet 643 feet Setbacks — building Apollo Drive I -35 side lot line Setbacks - parking Apollo Drive I -35 side lot line 50 feet 50 feet 10 feet 15 feet 15 feet 5 feet 70 feet 30 feet* 50 feet 15 feet 20 feet NA on west side (shared access proposed) Building height 45 feet 36 feet Green space 25 percent 46 percent * Flexibility requested Within SC zoning districts, a 50 foot setback is required from arterial streets. As shown on the preliminary site plan, a 30 foot principal building setback has been proposed along I -35. At 2.3 acres in size, the subject property also fails to meet the minimum 3 acre lot requirement imposed in the SC District. The PDO section of the Ordinance does state however, that perimeter setbacks can be established by applying the setback requirements of the surrounding district or can be related to the height of the buildings. While both the proposed setback and lot area deviations can be accommodated via the PDO, City officials should determine their acceptability.