My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/28/2000 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2000
>
02/28/2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 4:54:29 PM
Creation date
2/11/2014 9:11:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/28/2000
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />February 9, 2000 <br />Page 3 <br />Ms. Sherman pointed out the location of Units 35 and 36 and the driveways accessing the <br />cul -de -sac. She explained there was concern about the possibility of confusion plus there <br />is only five feet of green space so staff recommends the access to Units 35 and 36 be <br />provided from the other side with the proposed access being turned into green space. <br />Also, signage will be provided to indicate where access to the units is provided. <br />Mr. Corson asked if these issues have been reviewed by the Fire Marshal. Mr. Smyser <br />advised that the Fire Marshal had expressed no concerns with the original design but, <br />perhaps, this changed access point should be reviewed as well. <br />Chair Schaps asked that Condition #2 be modified to include review and approval by the <br />Fire Department and Police Department. The Board concurred. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if there are similar access restrictions and limited green space areas <br />with Units 26, 32, and 31. Ms. Sherman advised that patio block pavers have been <br />suggested for use rather than concrete walkways which staff felt was a good alternative. <br />Steve Schmitt, TSM Development, the developer <br />conditions and has no objections. He advised t <br />who will construct the units. He stated he bel' <br />earth -tone color and a homeowners associ on <br />for exterior maintenance. <br />ed he has reviewed staff's <br />the project to Eagle Crest <br />e siding will be some type of gray or <br />e created and collect monthly fees <br />have <br />Mr. Corson made a MOTION to a <br />Family Area based on the followin i' s: <br />to Plan for Highland Meadows Multi- <br />1. The final landsca.' "' an i L: ubject to the review and approval of the City <br />Environmental Speciali <br />a). A foundation- planti g plan shall be submitted for review and approval <br />prior to issuance of building permits. <br />b). Landscape plantings shall be added on the south side of Oak Drive and <br />around ponding/wetland to include native materials /seeds as buffer areas and <br />as part of the surface water treatment drain. <br />2. Access to units 35 and 36 shall be provided from the north and no access shall <br />be provided from the cul -de -sac subject to the approval of the Fire Chief and <br />Police Department. <br />3. Curb cuts shall be limited to 26 feet in width for accesses onto public roads <br />with a minimum 10 -foot separation. <br />4. Green space /rock separations shall be eliminated between driveways. <br />5. A lighting plan shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Police <br />Department. <br />6. Street, drainage and utility plans are subject to the review and approval of the <br />City Engineer. <br />7. All conditions of Preliminary Plat approval remain in effect. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.