Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07/10/2000 Council Packet
• • • AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday July 10, 2000 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? Consent Agenda — A) Consideration of Minutes i) June 7, 2000, Work Session Meeting Minutes (Follow Friday) ii) June 12, 2000, Council Meeting Minutes (Follow Friday) iii) June 21, 2000 Work Session Meeting Minutes (Follow Friday) B) Consideration of Expenditures: i) July 10, 2000 (Check No. 59293 — 59392 in the amount of $234,890.35) ii) Manual Checks iii) Centennial Fire District C) Consider Block Party Application for D) Consider Block Party Application for 2 Open Mike A) The Leonard Parker Associates Present the City Council with a Blue Heron (Francis Bulbulian, Craig Andersen), Mary Divine 534 Linden Lane 1385 Hunters Ridge 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch 4. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia 6. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner Page 1 AGENDA 7. Community Development Department Report, Brian Wessel A) PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution No. 00 -64, Adopt Assessment Roll, Twilight Acres 1St and 2nd Additions, (3/5 Vote Required) John Powell (Continue to July 24, 2000 City Council Meeting) B) Rehbein Companies /Centennial School District, Lake Drive /4th Ave., Minor Subdivision, (3/5 Vote Required) Mary Kay Wyland C) SECOND READING: Ordinance 10 -00 PCS Tower Moratorium (4/5 Vote Required) Jeff Smyser D) Preliminary Plat, Bluebill Ponds, (3/5 Vote Required) Jeff Smyser E) Resolution No. 00 -72, Consideration of Petition for Public Improvements, West Shadow Lake Drive, (3/5 Vote Required) John Powell F) Resolution No. 00 -68, Consideration of Bids, Apollo Drive Phase 4 Improvements, (3/5 Vote Required) - John Powell 8. Unfinished Business 9. New Business 10. Community Calendar, July 10, through July 24, 2000: A) Monday, July 10, 2000, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting B) Tuesday, July 11, 2000, 6:30 p.m., Park Board Meeting C) Wednesday, July 12, 2000, 6:30 a.m., P &Z Board Meeting D) Thursday, July 13, 2000, 7:00 a.m., EDAC E) Thursday, July 13, 2000, 7:00 p.m., Charter Commission Meeting F) Wednesday, July 19, 2000, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session G) Saturday, July 22, 2000, 7:00 a.m., Special Work Session to discuss Comp Plan H) Monday, July 24, 2000, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 11. Adjourn Revised 7/4/00 JMP 7:50 p.m. Page 2 • MANUAL EXPENDITURES June -2000 ADMINISTRATION FIRSTAR/RESERVATIONS- RADISON $ 100.00 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS /CERTIFICATE $ 415.00 MEMA/REGISTRATIONS /4 $ 68.00 FINANCE POLICE • UTILITY POSTMASTER/UTILITY BILLING POSTMASTER /UTILITY BILLING • $ 265.35 $ 323.61 TOTAL MANUAL DISBURSEMENT $ 1,171.96 Page 1 • • • Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 - Office (651) 784 -2427 - Fax July 5, 2000 TO: City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of expenses. Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #12262 — 12281, in the amount of $8,996.41 is hereby requested. • • • DATE CHECK# NAME 07/05/2000 12262 07/05/2000 12263 07/05/2000 12264 07/05/2000 12265 07/05/2000 12266 07/05/2000 12267 07/05/2000 12268 07/05/2000 12269 07/05/2000 12270 07/05/2000 12271 07/05/2000 12272 07/05/2000 12273 07/05/2000 12274 07/05/2000 12275 07/05/2000 12276 07/05/2000 12277 07/05/2000 12278 07/05/2000 12279 07/05/2000 12280 07/05/2000 12281 Centennial Fire District Check Register AitTouch Cellular All Star Sports, Inc. AT &T Wireless Centerville Floral Circle Pines Office Products Eddy Brother's Company Emergency Medical Products, Inc. Kathy Mischke Lino Lakes State Bank Milo Bennett Minnesota Department of Revenue Northern Tool & Equipment Company Pagenet Postmaster Red Rooster Auto Stores Reliant Energy Minnegasco Remember Me Floral Sentry Systems, Inc. Twin City Garage Door Company U.S. West Page 1 of 1 ACCOUNT AMOUNT 42240 - Telephone Expense $180.60 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 816.75 42240 - Telephone Expense 3.29 40100 - Logistical Expense 75.00 42180 - Office Supplies 2.11 42110 - Other Maintenance 44.10 42260 - Medical Supplies 186.06 42220 - Travel, School, Conference 30.77 41100 - Payroll Taxes Expense 3,375.74 42220 - Travel, School, Conference 160.68 41100 - Payroll Taxes Expense 1,435.00 42130 - Equipment Expense 1,305.65 42240 - Telephone Expense 26.11 42180 - Office Supplies 99.00 42110 - Other Maintenance 1.68 42253 - Station 2 Utilities - Gas 97.60 40100 - Logistical Expense 59.64 42110 - Other Maintenance 60.55 42110 - Other Maintenance 331.90 42240 - Telephone Expense 704.18 Total $8,996.41 • CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 1C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk MEETING DATE: July 10, 2000 TOPIC: Consider Block Party VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: A block party is planned at 534 Linden Lane a corner cul -de -sac starting at 5:00 p.m. on Sunday, July 30, ending 9:00 p.m. The attached map shows the location of the party. Also, find a list that shows the property owners who have signed the petition acknowledging they were notified about the party. The Police Department, Fire Department and Public Works Department have been informed about the party. The Public Works Department plans to provide barricades to redirect traffic. The Police Department may visit the site during the hours of operation. The Fire Department will be visiting the block party at their request. In the past, the City Council has encouraged block parties as it presents an opportunity for creating community and to create a setting to form a neighborhood crime watch unit. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the block party application 2. Deny the block party application 3. Return to staff for further research RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends option no. 1 • DATE (//0/z 0°6 BLOCK PARTY APPLICATION CITY OF LINO LAKES The following application is herewith submitted to the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, as a request to hold a block party on the public right -of -way. NAME OF APPLICANT ADDRESS HOME TELEPHONE NO. : //3 `0 F/ WORK TELEPHONE NO. : LOCATION OF BLOCK PARTY (Street name & location, intersection to intersection) ' J 4).-,,e,-,-1 /� C 7, l qf{e- `� (_,,. A e,- r mil de Sat of ei,,e r Arr iliac e f, ii ,r4,4 1.,.n.-?C" - ewes- : 6,241 ic:'T{Ll (.1:...:_, '' :I 3' l'.'.- 1 L PURPOSE OF PARTY.) 4 5 ;c 4, JfitcG -e•{ p.e-A Ac.1 ,r f04.i; -.-;i .ssivo... f . U f i e,v e4.P, -4. 6C;=' , S-aW. v; r,C,res- C DATE AND HOURS OF PARTY: _57,k4ty, -.I; Iv .)761 J o o - 7.06 (Not to exceed 10:00 P.M.) IT IS HEREBY AGREED: The applicants agree to abide by all rules set forth below, together with all ordinances and regulations which may be imposed governing such activities. 1. Petition. All residents living on the street or block in which the activity is planned, must sign on the last page of this application indicating they consent or do not object to the block party. 2. Barricades. Applicants shall be responsible for placement, maintenance and removal of barricades to be provided by the City in proper locations, such barricades to be left by the City on one corner of the block. Barricades shall be placed at either end of the street in which the block party is to take place. PAGE -1- • • NAME PETITION (Residents Consenting) ADDRESS s L:Ardtil LIT TELE. NO. Name of Organization . (If applicable) Checked by: Police Department Public Works Department • • BLOCK PARTY APPLICATION (Continued) 3. Traffic. The total roadway portion of the right -of -way shall not be blocked; at least a 10 foot aisle shall be kept open at all time to permit passage of vehicles of residents of the block and emergency or other authorized or necessary vehicles to enter or exit. 4. Surface of Street. No materials of any type (such as powder, sawdust, etc.) shall be placed on the public right -of -way which will create a hazard. 5. Supervision. Applicants shall maintain adult supervision at all times during the activity. 6. Clean -up. Applicants shall provide trash receptacles to prevent as much littering as possible. Applicants shall be responsible for the pick -up or disposal of trash and garbage following the event. Such clean -up shall be completed within 24 hours after termination of the activity, but in no event later than midnight the following day of the block party. 7. Speakers. No loud speaker system shall produce sounds audible outside the areas designated for the block party. PAGE -2- ® LSt0Y .00 N 1 1 W • to co 2 I" Z ZI _ £C601. 1 5 O m/yh Q "O Z L• 9•Ib1 M,45,OO400 N Ill J £L Z01 00'06 r....,9Z'ZDL•` 1 to•co,,: _ 6f'901 .� l'091yM -h 6'tL- M94L0.90 1 1 L_oo_06 _J 191 S o .00 N 61.4C,0 00 N er o Ca\ 00•s£ r 3.LS,LC,00 NJ oz oo'SrLJ 'n i •••i 00'SCl•aj '?.Zt7l0eo0 CO I ° i ••.1 - 00•SCtJ 3,ZS loo -q .-1 _ 00'SCLJ Or XLS tCeoo N7l o � 01 L oo•srt J f .L.C, C.00 N-1 O L 00•0c� ;' j�LST£e00 Noj o 0 co 0I L WWI J L3 ECo0� rr� m " I CP 0I L oo'scL 00 -1 SlZ9 —,— .00 , 06'9C h� CULL- 09 0, I — — ov I 3.LS,lC °00 N W � .2I .-1 _49'9L}_ ico •••1 3,LS,l£eo0 N -a LOL1- 3.LS , l£e00 N W O o — Z<'Zzl- 0) �5 h �0O0 1..05 \ 1 \ +- i Zs the Pr% ■ •o, a \V w 4 °A h" O wry / /oh •o y n ��y� (L�� / OD OF2 • 4 4,„,/ � /i \ m 0h 0o 0 L_ bL••L- 09 I3.LS,LCe00 N1 L oo.scL J f3.LS, t£.00 N7 n 1 co so ail Or L r0.5C1 c�J 9L_C6 _/ / M.46,00e00 N 0 0 co m .oy(`N N z£,• tZ,OSe00 MIM. g S6SZL6 W zz •�I • to LL'Lll m c aTc .15T N7:1 I y+ 4■ J a /i9 'n • /n /- v� wag <.e<V ies! 7 < OF /9 q0. os, �7 �'° r9•S'o N ` ' c% e• ar 4 �•� , • � •wry /F£L,OreOt-p {� ' j/ t� o %• n ` .°1 64.9tN�n • r- 'OO • 01 •r9 i s_dr k'G 0. de, 4) a; *F.;C N LZ.ZC.00 3.24,i1.00 N C9'001.-1 09 • /� ' '••' ; > / 49 • *� `r' Y�V \1 til ♦I% .ai 1 I\ I I I tin %,-; 1 \II II 1 11 11 1 I• • I Z I sJ �J • y9' \C12 M Jq LQ -Joc • - L-00'S£l 0sL 1 'an n. oc �3.LZ,Z£e00 N N I L _Poort r3.LZ,Z£o00 NI co I L 00'SCL r3.LZ,ZCe00 �P (" ►c) 00'SC�- F.LZ r.00 nTl I of J CO 1 3.6$ $',oN :`.Ii t -- co H 1 ''1 00• SCL J 0 I Co 09 I� for 46° • 60,04. , V 9'• 0009 •eCG Line of the NF1 /4 of the NW1 /n of n... 17 T 11 a h+i • • • CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 1D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk MEETING DATE: July 10, 2000 TOPIC: Consider Block Party VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: A block party is planned at 1385 Hunters Ridge a through street at 3:00 p.m. on Saturday, July 15, ending at 10:00 p.m. The attached map shows the location of the party. Also, find a list that shows the property owners who have signed the petition acknowledging they were notified about the party. Please note two property owners did not sign the petition, however the applicant received their signatures after their return from vacation. The Police Department, Fire Department and Public Works Department have been informed about the party. The Fire Department will be visiting the block party at their request. The Public Works Department is not in favor of barricading a through road because of limited traffic circulation. The Police Department supports the party for the opportunity to create community and to create a setting to form a neighborhood crime unit. In the past, the City Council has approved this applicant for a block party at this location. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the block party application 2. Deny the block party application 3. Return to staff for further research RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends option no. 1 • • DATE BLOCK PARTY APPLICATION CITY OF LINO LAKES The following application is herewith submitted to the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, as a request to hold a block party on the public right -of -way. NAME OF APPLICANT : fa.. r ( Ljke0 ADDRESS I3S8 (-fiin}Z rS et',/je, 9. HOME TELEPHONE NO. : (65-/) (1_�j-?S-�,Cj WORK TELEPHONE NO. : Ce.c1) Lf )- '-OS )-Z LOCATION OF BLOCK PARTY (Street name 4 location, intersection to intersection) v'-Ee . T•m � o(f . ; . T mberwoI -f raii PURPOSE Oi+'' PARTY : Y'yg Pe.4 6o4s "tOgdl ke r' DATE AND SOURS OP PARTY: TO/ (s 30'4 �O j6pv (Not to exceed 10:00 P.M.) IT IS HEREBY AGREED: The applicants agree to abide by all rules set forth below, together with all ordinances and regulations which may be imposed governing such activities. 1. Petition_ All residents living an the street or block in which the activity is planned, must sign on the last page of this application indicating they consent or do not object to the block party. 2. parricadest. Applicants shall be responsible for placement, maintenance and removal of barricades to be provided by the City in proper locations, Such barricades to be left by the City on one corner of the block. Barricades shall be placed at either end of the street in which the block party is to take place. PAGE -1- PETITION (Residents Consenting) Name of Organization (If applicable) Checked by: Police Department Public, Works Department ELECTRIC PICTURE COMPANY 612 482 9977 ►'€14- 1:.sc r- / 4„f 1 rS P\1a(se Gel i4`e S • L t ?KO for t k 6(30/240 t o-[ Ni4(41--e(s 3-k( , bloLk part y --3;r,A\t%-es 4O%-L. \Ytc\ \\*)ve'S C="s 3 - P.61 1 stit 09' 0 "E. .$90 N / ■ opt 4 c4 ttnO*5 tip 1.93 tnt l.6 0 0 3.7�c u'1.670< ti • od ao' et' �V �^ A. gry • 5 • ZS ' 4 c ' 09 0 £6'881 3.10.1£.£06 0 0 ,o to £6•591 3 „10,1£•£06 49'051 1 =^ • tri U7 L nD 10 0 0 1610Z 3 „45,0¢„10. cy ,^a4 • I:\Z8 6 M„05.65.Z0 • rn ►p „OS.6S ;LON 81.4_1 — --- `0 Q %0 O 0 • tfi 03 91 M��08,66 ZON__:_r.. 09 "� 09'9CZ w 0 z 154.Oa�' • ` No6.51'4r -7.4;k: 4.01,44 rT 'O LSO6.57' 4 r � 0 £1 941 w N hl1 „94,8£•DON d• N t-N cn N 4l 7 Q el „OS,6S.Z0N (' . £S'4Z r 0 `po L505'?7' ., aD d+��0 '- *) QJ.J 09 0 O� 8O 90/S0'd e£•£61 3 „09,65-z0S 66bZ E96 'Egg � au $g37k8„ R�B20.00 .�f g9: N1�o / SSNdl ON I1 AO J.1 I0 a. cc LA 0 ? N w W N N o09a' 00'D9 I 00'6'1 30 1 leg N i o +— L M „94�9£POON • • OD'9t1� 30 00'SoZ M„94,8£.00N 40 ,2\ 20'd LL66 Z8$' ZT9 ANHdWOO 321f110Id 0I813373 ED 80:ZT 0002- bt -Nflf • J LAN a, r.w•• • 13I,0CA PARTY APPLICATION [CoAti_nued} 3. Traffic. The total roadway portion of the right -of -way shall not be blocked; at least a 10 foot aisle shall be kept open at all time to permit passage of vehicles of residents of the block and emergency or other authorized or necessary vehicles to enter or exit. 4. Surface of Street. No materials of any type (such as powder, sawdust, etc.) shall be placed on the public right -of -way which will create a hazard. 5. Supervision. Applicants shall maintain adult supervision at all times during the activity. 6. Clean -up. Applicants shall provide trash receptacles to prevent as much littering as .possible. Applicants shall be responsible for the pick -up or disposal of trash and garbage following the event. Such clean -up shall be completed within 24 hours after termination of the activity, but in no event later than midnight the following day of the block party. 7. Speakers. No loud speaker system shall produce sounds audible outside the are designated for the block party. PAGE -2- • • 7, COUNCIL MINUTES • Staff recommended adoption of a motion approving the block party. • • MAY 24, 1999 Council Member Lyden moved to approve the application for a block party on Glen Circle as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of an Application for a Block Party, Hunters Ridge - A request has been made to hold a block party on Hunters Ridge July 17, 1999, 3:00 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. Staff referred to a map that indicated the location of the proposed party and the property owners who acknowledged they have been notified of the party. Staf d ed the location of the proposed party is not on a cul -de -sac. There is nothing in the City c -'s that prohibits a block party that is not on a through street. The street will be blocked oth ends of the party location. It was determined that Council will get a statement from Chief Pecchia regarding block parties being held on through streets. Council will discuss the issue at the next Council work session. Council Member Lyden moved to approve the applicatio r a . ck party on Hunters Ridge as presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the mot ii ration cawed unanimously. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER Consideration of Resolution No. for Kite Day - The Lino Lake Day event on Saturday, Jun has donated $200 to help • e rag Donation from Mountain Enterprises anion Department will be holding its fourth Kite ce'1ake Elementary School. Mountain Enterprises ofthis event. ,art. Council Member Dahl moved ®tiadopt Resolution No. 99 - 39, as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 99 - 39 can be found at the end of these minutes. Resignation of Street Maintenance Employee - Mr. Chuck Wilke has submitted his resignation from the Public Works Department to pursue other opportunities. Mr. Wilke's last day of employment was May 20, 1999. Council Member Bergeson moved to accept Mr. Wilke's resignation, as presented. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, BRIAN WESSEL Consideration of Resolution No. 99 - 25, Comp Plan Amendment for Interim MUSA - Rezone to PDO and Preservation Development Preliminary Plat for Peregrine Pass, SMA Construction, Steve Arndorfer, 6462 - 12th Avenue, Jeff Smyser (4/5 Vote Required) - Steve 3 • • AGENDA ITEM 7A STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 10, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 -64, Adopt Assessment Roll, Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Additions (Continue to July 24, 2000) VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: On June 26, 2000, the City Council held a public hearing for this project. After receiving public comment, the consideration of the resolution adopting the assessment was delayed to allow staff time to gather additional information. After discussing this matter with the contractor, C. H. Houle, they have agreed to honor their bid even if the City delays the award until August 28, 2000. C.W. Houle would need to begin construction by September 8, 2000, in order to complete the improvements, through the bituminous paving, this year. The restoration of the boulevard areas and driveways would likely carry over until spring of 2001. The property owner survey will be sent out early next week, in time to have results by the July 19 Work Session. The City Attorney can provide a status report on the appraisal preparation at the City Council meeting. OPTIONS: 1. Continue the public hearing until July 24, 2000. 2. Consider Resolution No. 00 -64 adopting the assessment roll for the Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Addition project. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1 - Continue the public hearing. • • • AGENDA ITEM 7 B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland MEETING DATE: July 10, 2000 TOPIC: Rehbein Companies & Independent School District #12 Minor Subdivision VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority DESCRIPTION: This item involves a joint application by Rehbein Companies and Independent School District #12 for two minor subdivisions that will formalize a land exchange made when the Centennial Middle School was constructed. The first parcel is immediately north of the school and was originally a part of a triangular piece of property sold by Rehbein to the School District. The request is to split off the easterly 7.54 acres of this parcel of property with ownership retained by Rehbein Companies. When the School District property was rezoned to PSP, this parcel remained Zoned Industrial at the City's recommendation. This parcel will remain a part of the Rehbein Industrial area to the north and east. The second parcel of property is approximately 5.04 acres between 4th Avenue and Lake Drive just north of Don's Circle Service. The request is to split this parcel into a 1.56 acre piece with frontage on Lake Drive and a 3.48 acre piece adjacent to the school property. The 3.48 acre parcel contains a large drainage /ponding easement for the School District site. The property is currently owned by Rehbein but will be transferred to the School District upon approval of the subdivision. Both parcels are Zoned Light Industrial and meet the minimum requirements for a LI Zoning District. Sewer and water could be extended to Parcel A on Lake Drive and will be available to the larger triangular piece of property upon development of the Rehbein industrial area. Staff would recommend approval of this minor subdivision as requested with the following condition: 1. Twenty feet (20') of additional right -of -way shall be dedication from Parcel A to Anoka County providing a total of 60' from the centerline of Lake Drive. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item at their May 10th meeting and recommended approval. NOTE: For City Council information we have attached assessment information requested at last City Council Meeting. OPTIONS: . 1. Approve minor subdivision as requested with the condition indicated above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • EMMSS! SCHOOL ON ao � ounnr — s P I AIR A' PARK �1ha0;F °_1111111, M. �e JP ti:u NORTH 2 qit 0, K .b FAR ice® I:tx F' RM h p © ©mm� ©o,° �av0� a ono de Ana �WGOi°o�4.44 ,FARM a girdn�itnAmn■°■ Mi©ia0MM © 3 3 I SI 0i0 0 4 Imi ovd CLI Ili III ®0 g � ms's RR'' 30 38 1Q�1J 3 d 5 10 om ©n— ....._.,.., INW STR'P ' LINO LAKES L REHABILITATION CENTER MARSHAN LAKE !gym n'btimaca emr, • 3.41x,..p.; , • • • 7.54! 4c. t C: mot ' e.0.1401 Snw1-1i title oE NE V.4 PC 56 /f- Sac 1f3. • /�11Cic4 f )5; -t• =4" " $$8° 14'04. "L1 That part of the Northeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota lying southerly of Highway 35W and northeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter; thence South 88' degrees, 14 minutes, 06 seconds West, assumed bearing along the south line thereof 440 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 44 degrees, 06 seconds, West 392.15 feet to the southerly line of said Highway 35W and said line there terminating. Subject to easements. Rer- 3-27 -00 Scale: 1 "= Book flqe .Tob No. AaAanS Jo a ;eouiva9 I hereby cerlr /y fhclI This plan, survey. or report ivas prepared by me or under my direcf .supervision n,o' that' I corn a c►irw Ae�ister•td Lood Surveyor ur der the. /c; Ws of the Rote. of Mcnncsofc7 . Coded this /6__ clay ReIislr'alinn No. /Rae% GINN RE1f3EIN CCNPANIES 8651 Naples St. N.E. Blaine, Mn. 55449 Tel. 724- 0657 • • Planning & Zoning Board May 10, 2000 Page 3 Mr. Rafferty stated he agrees with Mr. Johnson and does not understand what type of hardship would force the hanger to be at the location by the street. Ms. Wyland stated that is also staff's finding. However, the applicant would prefer the view of the runway from his front window rather than a view of the hanger. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to deny the variance request by Carl Johnson, 310 Carl Street, based on the rationale that the development plan for the lots in Lino Air Park North initially indicated that the hanger location would be toward the runway, the unique nature of the drainage easement on the lot does not constitute a hardship, and the property could be put to a reasonable use because the home and accessory building could be constructed to meet the requirements of the Ordinance by locating the hanger to the rear of the lot and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Corson arrived at 6:46 p.m. B. Rehbein Companies & Independent School District #12, Minor Subdivision Staff presented the joint application by Rehbein Co " ies and Independent School District #12 for two minor subdivisions that will f e the land exchange made when the Centennial Middle School was constructed.° aff pr ted their analysis of this application and recommends approval of the bdivision as requested. It was noted that staff has submitted this informa .n to ,i, •ka County to determine if additional right -of -way will be required along Lake � : ld additional right -of -way be required by the County, a revised Ce �cat is urvey showing the roadway dedication will be necessary prior to Council : �� d ` • eed transferring title prior to document recording. Mr. Rafferty stated he spok j • • of Superintendent John McClellan who explained this transaction between them bein Companies and their swapping of land. Superintendent McClellan indicated he would support the minor subdivision but is concerned there has never been an indication that Fourth Street will continue past the school. Ms. Wyland stated the development of the Rehbein property will be served off a cul -de- sac so it is not the intention to bring industrial traffic through on Fourth Avenue. Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to approve the minor subdivision as requested by Rehbein Companies and Independent School District #12 that will formalize a land exchange made when the Centennial Middle School was constructed and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 5 -1 (Zych). C. Bluebill Ponds, Preliminary Plat, Main Street Staff advised that Heritage Development has submitted revised plans that include a four - way intersection and an extended Wood Duck Trail and been successful in negotiations with the House of Praise Church that allows the extension of Wood Duck Trail. However, numerous engineering issues remain unresolved which are significant enough • • • AGENDA ITEM 7C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: July 10, 2000 TOPIC: SECOND READING: Ordinance 10 -00 PCS Tower Moratorium ACTION: 4/5 vote BACKGROUND On May 22 the City Council adopted Resolution #00 -67 directing staff to initiate the process for adopting a moratorium on new towers for personal wireless services, such as wireless telephone services. On June 26, the Council approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 10 -00 which establishes the moratorium. The moratorium ordinance will be treated as an amendment to the zoning ordinance, which requires a 4/5 vote. The following schedule gives the anticipated timeline of the ordinance process. May 22 City Council meeting: initiate process for adopting 90 -day moratorium by directing staff to prepare ordinance and setting public hearing date June 14 public hearing at Planning & Zoning Board meeting June 26 first reading of ordinance at City Council meeting July 10 second reading of ordinance at City Council meeting July 17 ordinance published in newspaper August 16 ordinance effective (30 days after publication) November 14 90 -day moratorium expires OPTIONS 1. Approve second reading of Ordinance 10 -00 establishing a moratorium on new towers. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • • Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 10 -00 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW TOWER STRUCTURES FOR THE PROVISION OF PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICES The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does hereby ordain: Section 1. Findings The City Council finds that current demand for personal wireless services in the metropolitan area is creating the need for new antenna locations. The antennae may be located on buildings, water towers, and other tall structures, including towers constructed specifically for the antennae. The City Council finds further that a study is warranted to examine the demand for new towers and the potential tower sites for provision of personal wireless services. The purpose of the study is to create a plan of how best to provide for the provision of personal wireless services while minimizing the number of tower structures and protecting the public health, safety, and welfare. The City Council finds, therefore, that a moratorium is required in order to protect the planning process and to prevent the construction of new towers pending the completion of the study and the consideration and, if necessary, implementation of new regulations. Section 2. Moratorium Established In accordance with the findings set forth in this ordinance and pursuant to the authority of Minnesota Statutes 462.355 Subd. 4, there is hereby established a moratorium on the permitting and construction of new personal wireless services towers within the City. During the period of the moratorium, applications for new towers shall not be accepted by the City nor shall any building permits for such work be issued. For the purposes of the moratorium, the term "tower" shall mean "any ground mounted pole, spire, structure, or combination thereof, including supporting lines, cables, wires, braces, masts, intended primarily for the purpose of mounting an antenna or similar apparatus above grade." Section 3. Applicability The moratorium shall be applicable to property throughout the City. The moratorium applies only to new tower structures for personal wireless services. • • • Section 4. Exceptions The moratorium shall not apply to (1) personal wireless service antennae mounted on existing structures; (2) the repair and/or maintenance of any existing tower provided that such work does not enlarge or expand that tower; (3) work on a tower necessary to preserve health, safety, life, or property in the face of an emergency, or (4) amateur radio towers. Section 5. Effective Date This ordinance shall be in force and effect upon its adoption and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. This ordinance shall be effective for 90 days after its effective date and shall expire at that time unless further extended. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2000 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. s • • • AGENDA ITEM 7D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: July 10, 2000 TOPIC: Preliminary Plat, Bluebill Ponds ACTION: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND The site is on the south side of Main St. across from Wood Duck Trail and Blue Bill Lane. The project has undergone numerous revisions since its initial design. The primary outstanding issue was the access to Main St. Heritage Development has reached an agreement with the House of Praise Church that will allow Wood Duck Trail to extend south of Main St., creating a full access intersection. This report refers to the following plans, all received by the City May 12, 2000: Preliminary Plat 4/28/00 Preliminary Utility Plan 4/28/00 Preliminary Grading Plan 4/26/00 Infiltration & Erosion Control Plan 4/26/00 Tree Preservation Plan 5/10/00 Wetland Replacement and Impact Plans 5/1/00 ANALYSIS Project Data: Total site 36.76 acres Wetlands 2.15 acres 77 single family lots. Gross density 2.09 units per acre. Net density (without wetlands) 2.22 units per acre. Land Use and Zoning: The site is completely within the existing MUSA and is zoned R -1. Land use and zoning for the site and surrounding land are listed in the table. Comprehensive Plan (existing) Comprehensive Plan (1998 draft) Zoning site SF Residential Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1 SF Resid. north (across Main St.) SF Residential Low Density Unsewered Resid. R Rural east SF Residential Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1 SF Resid. west SF Residential Low Density Sewered Resid. R Rural south SF Residential Low Density Unsewered Resid. R Rural • Bluebill Ponds July 10, 2000 page 2 This site requires careful consideration because of its location relative to existing, pending, and future development. Access to Main St. is one issue, but the City must also consider traffic circulation on this site and surrounding sites in the future. The existing Mar Don Acres neighborhood and the developing Highland Meadows projects both relate directly to Bluebill Ponds. In addition, the City must consider the potential for development to the immediate west and east of Bluebill Ponds. This project is a good example of how land use planning and transportation planning are closely related, not separate processes. Lots, Blocks The plat complies with the maximum block length standard of 1500 feet. The submitted information indicates that lot areas shown on the plat do not include wetlands or ponds. All lot areas would then comply with the required minimum area of 10,800 sf of buildable land per lot in the R -1 zone. All lots meet the minimum width and depth requirements, of 80 ft. and 135 ft., respectively. The double frontage lots on Main St. meet the 145 ft. depth requirement, and all corner lots meet the 100 ft. width standard. Transportation, Roads, Access, Circulation The proposed roads provide access to Main St. and internal circulation on the site. Two roads, Street A and Woodduck Lane, provide for future connection to other sites. Cul de sacs will be required at the ends of "Street A" and "Woodduck Lane." As noted in his memo (comment #24), the City Engineer is comfortable with having the cul de sacs completely within the proposed rights of way. The cul de sacs will be smaller than is typical, but because of the short length of the cul de sacs, we do not anticipate a problem for emergency vehicles. We have received a petition for public improvements that would include roadways and public utilities within the site. The City Council acted on June 12 (Resolution 00 -33) to direct staff to prepare a feasibility study under the 429 assessment and public improvement process. Main St. Access: The major issue on this plat has been access to Main St. (CSAH 14). Anoka County and the City recently completed an access management study. Eventually, Main St. probably will have a median separating eastbound and westbound traffic. The access study recommends full access intersections with a spacing of one -half mile. Wood Duck Trail is the designated location for a full access intersection. Bluebill Lane will be a limited access intersection, which means it will be a right - in/right -out only intersection, where vehicles will not be able to take left turns and cross the median. The Bluebill Ponds development, with 77 lots, would be ill- served with a limited access intersection. In addition, the City should be looking to provide circulation in the area. Ultimately, there will be 150+ dwelling units in Highland Meadows developments. A • • • Bluebill Ponds July 10, 2000 page 3 full access intersection on Main St. is the appropriate connection, and Wood Duck Trail is the appropriate location for it. The issue with the Main St. access has been that the extension of Wood Duck Tr. south of Main St. crosses the current property of the House of Praise church. The developer and the church have negotiated a land trade that allows the Wood Duck extension. The developer will have better access for the new development. Access on the new Wood Duck Tr. will be safer for churchgoers than access on Main St. In addition, the church will best be served with a full intersection rather than partial access to Main St. The City will benefit from the improved safety because of the better access management, and from improved circulation in that area of the City. The new roads through the plats in the area will be very curvy. They will not be very good for a shortcut route between Main St. and Lake Drive. Rather, the new roads will provide circulation through these neighborhoods and access for the residents. Road Along Mar Don Acres (Street A): Mar Don Acres is immediately south of the Bluebill Ponds site. When Mar Don Acres was platted in 1978, the northern 30 feet was included in an easement. This 30 feet was intended to be the southern half of a right of way for a road. The other half would be supplied when the land to the north (the Bluebill Ponds site) was developed. Following the first review of Bluebill Ponds by P & Z in October 1999, several residents of Mar Don Acres informed us that they want the road built along the south border of Bluebill Ponds. They want the option of subdividing their lots, which requires the road to provide access. Staff held a neighborhood meeting on November 9, 1999 to discuss this issue. Residents along the alignment of the desired road were invited, including those in Mar Don Acres, Sherwood Green, and unplatted properties to the north. Based on this meeting and follow -up calls to residents who were not at the meeting, staff found that six of eight property owners in Mar Don Acres wanted the road. Residents in Sherwood Green and lots to the west of BlueBill Ponds did not want the road. Staff directed the developer to include a road on the plat. Mar Don Acres Want Road? Yes or No Lot 1 No Lot 2 Yes, on east half of lot only Lot 3 Yes Lot 4 No Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 Yes Sherwood Green Lots 1 -4, Block 1 No • Bluebill Ponds July 10, 2000 page 4 The City Engineer's comments list issues to be addressed, but he is comfortable that they can be resolved with the indicated changes to the plans. Utilities As noted above, we have received a petition for public improvements that would include roadways and public utilities within the site. The City Council acted on June 12 (Resolution 00 -33) to direct staff to prepare a feasibility study under the 429 assessment and public improvement process. Stormwater Management and Wetlands: Several small wetlands exist on the site and will be impacted by the project. The impacted wetlands are very small and unexceptional. The mitigation plan is part of the review by the Rice Creek Watershed District. The wetlands will be covered by a drainage easement on the final plat according to standard policy. The Watershed District review status is "tabled with authorization for administrative action." This means that the remaining issues can be handled by District staff as long as the applicant submits additional information in a timely manner. The City Engineer's comments list a number of technical issues to be addressed, but he is comfortable that they can be resolved with the indicated changes to the plans. Sewer and Water: Sewer and water service will come from Main St. The City will need to prepare a feasibility study to determine how this development and nearby areas will best be served. It is City policy that the benefiting property owner bear the cost of such a study. We have received a petition for public improvements that would include extending sewer and water to the site. This petition was scheduled for action by the City Council on June 12. Staff will have an update for the P & Z. The City Engineer's comments list a number of technical issues to be addressed, but he is comfortable that they can be resolved with the indicated changes to the plans. Parks and Trails Originally, staff envisioned some park land in the southeast corner of the site, near the park in the Highland Meadows West plat. The two sites touch at the corners only, so the entire park would be oddly configured. The missing connecting piece would have to be filled in when the land to the east of Bluebill Ponds develops. We have no indication that this will occur in the foreseeable future, so the missing piece was only speculative. The road on the south edge of the plat (Street A) renders that idea impractical. This road was requested by the majority of the residents on the south side of the road, in Mar Don Acres. The future extension of this will separate the Bluebill Ponds site from the Highland Meadows park site. • • • Bluebill Ponds July 10, 2000 page 5 The 1992 trail plan envisions a trail crossing this site from east to west to facilitate a future connection between the park and 4th Ave. However, a connection to 4th Ave. will be difficult to create unless land to the west develops. Currently, that area is zoned Rural. The draft comprehensive plan shows some additional land in a growth area, but not all the way to 4th Ave. The residential streets provide bicycle and pedestrian access across this plat and to the Highland Meadows park. The additional right of way being dedicated for Main St. provides enough width for a future trail to be constructed there. The park dedication requirement is about 3.3 acres, or the equivalent in cash. We estimate that the cash dedication would be approximately $89,000, depending on the land value. The Park Board reviewed the latest plan revision on June 5 and recommends the cash dedication rather than land. The Park Board's recommendations are attached. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS The Environmental Board considered the original application on September 29, 1999. Though the plan layout has changed since then, the environmental conditions on the site have not. The Environmental Board's recommendations are attached. That Board recommends a 50 ft. buffer around the forest on the east edge of the site, infiltration and overland runoff design where possible, open spaces to be incorporated into the design, use of native vegetation, a buffer around wetlands, and deep tilling of topsoil. This site is in the existing MUSA and zoned for residential development. No planned development is involved. Therefore, the zoning requirements apply and there is little room for flexibility or negotiation. Wetlands will be covered with an easement, though the wetlands are not exceptional and there is little justification for exceptional measures. The site is essentially an open field with little in the way of natural features or potential for interesting open space. Infiltration is required by the Watershed District and the City when possible. Native vegetation can be required around ponds and wetlands. While no buffer is provided, the submitted tree plan should be revised to accommodate the City Environmental Specialist's comments in his memo of June 1. These include extension of the tree fence and oak wilt protection measures. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD ACTION The P & Z reviewed the project on June 14 and voted unanimously to approve the project with the conditions of approval 1 -7 below. • • • Bluebill Ponds July 10, 2000 page 6 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to any site grading. 2. Utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District prior to site grading. 3. The City Engineer's comments in his memo of June 1, 2000 must be addressed to his satisfaction prior to site grading. 4. The tree preservation plan shall be amended according to the City Environmental Specialist memo of 6/1/00 prior to site grading. 5. Plantings around wetlands and ponds shall be as recommended by the City Environmental Specialist and shall be included in the development agreement. 6. The developer must obtain needed approvals from Anoka County for access to Main St. and work in the right of way. 7. Park dedication shall be cash in lieu of land as recommended by the Park Board. 8. An agreement between the developer and the House of Praise Church must be reached, to the satisfaction of both parties, that allows Woodduck Trail to extend south of Main St. as shown on the approved preliminary plat. OPTIONS 1. Approve the preliminary plat with conditions included in this report. 2. Deny the preliminary plat. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. Memorandum DATE: June 1, 2000 TO: Jeff Smyser, City Planner FROM: John Powell, City Engineer RE: Bluebill Ponds Preliminary Plan Review Comments We have completed our review of the latest engineering submittal for the referenced project. Our comments are as follows: 1). The minimum storm sewer size allowed is 15" RCP. 2) The infiltration tube located on the high point behind Lots 6 & 7, Block 4 does not seem appropriate. 3) There needs to be an easement between Lots 5 & 6, Block 4 and between Lots 13 & 14, Block 4 for the proposed sanitary sewer. 4) A catch basin needs to be shown on the 18" storm sewer line at the rear lot line between Lots 7 & 8, Block 4. It is shown on the grading plan, but not on the utility plan. 5) The sanitary sewer needs to be extended to service Lot 3, Block 1. Sanitary sewer services can not be connected to manholes. The majority of the sanitary sewer manholes do not meet the minimum depth requirements. Any sanitary sewer that does not have at least 7 feet of cover must be insulated. The hydrant located in front of Lot 12, Block 2 is not needed. The required fire protection is achieved without it. 8) A hydrant needs to be added at the dead end watermain adjacent to Lot 1, Block 1 for flushing purposes. 9) A storm sewer schedule and calculations need to be submitted. 10) Utility details need to be added. 11) Supporting calculations for the infiltration tubes needs to be provided. 12) The lowest opening elevations for Lots 9 & 10, Block 3 must be raised to 1' above the emergency overflow elevation. 13) The catchbasins in the low points on Street A and Street B need to be located immediately across from each other. • • • 14) The radius in the southwest corner of Street B and Street C will need to have the concrete curb tipped out, or a cross gutter, to prevent water from ponding. 15) The street grade arrow on Street C is pointed in the wrong direction. 16) The proposed contours on the grading plan need to be labeled. 17) For Lot 21, Block 3 the low floor elevation needs to be raised to 907.0. 18) The side yard setbacks are 10' on the house side and 5' on the garage side. The standard detail calls for 10' in both cases. 19) Verification of soil types used in model must be provided. 20) If proposed Reach 100 corresponds to existing Reach 2, then the discharge for the 2 year and 10 year proposed condition exceeds the existing condition. 21) It is unclear where Pond 6 discharges according to the routing information provided. 22) The 100 -year flood elevations of backyard ponding in subcatchment 78 and 79 need to be provided. 23) The RCWD reviewed this project at their May 24, 2000, meeting. The permit has been "TWAFAA" pending additional submittals. 24) Cul -de -sacs are not shown for the southeast and west roadways terminations. Temporary cul -de -sacs, which are completely contained within the proposed rights -of -way, will be allowed at these locations. 25) It is our understanding the developer does not control abutting properties at this time. 26) It is not clear whether or not the proposed 28 foot street width has been incorporated into the hydraulic and hydrologic design. Overall, most of the issues raised by our last review have been addressed. • Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 982 -2440 Fax (651) 982 -2439 • June 6, 2000 TO: Mary Kay Wyland, Planning Coordinator FROM: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director SUBJECT: Bluebill Ponds Motion — Park Board Meeting 6/5/00 At the June 5, 2000 Park Board meeting the following motion was made after the board reviewed the revised preliminary plat for Bluebill Ponds. Paul Montain made a motion to take cash in lieu of land and pursue the purchase of Outlot D in the Highland Meadows addition with the balance being used for development of the park. Also, eliminate the proposed trails included in a motion at the March 6, 2000 Park Board meeting. Joe Boyle seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. sw /parkbrdBluebill Ponds Motion 6 -5 -00 Meeting.doc Lino Lakes Environmental Division Memo To: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson Date: 06/01/00 Re: Blue Bill Ponds Tree Preservation I have reviewed the tree preservation plan for Blue Bill Ponds and have the following comments: • On the Eastem Edge of the woodland on the Western side of the development, tree protection fence should be extended from tree no. 2383 to tree no. 2386. There appears to be a gap here. Although these trees may fall on other properties, root zones should be protected on these trees. • Tree no 2394 is a double clump oak tree. The southem most stem (22" dia.) should be removed for safety reasons. • There should be agreement to install vibratory plow lines in the same tree line area to control oak wilt. Trees appear to be dying due to a possible recent oak wilt infection. • Protection fence needs to be indicated on the plan protecting the Westem edge of the woodland on the Eastern side of the development. Although these trees are not necessarily on the property, root zones on these trees need to be protected. • All protection measures have to be installed and inspected before soil disturbance on the property. • This is the oak wilt season. All necessary pruning on oaks and all accidental wounding of oaks must be painted immediately. • Page 1 • MEMORANDUM TO: Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator Brian Wessel, Director of Community Development Rick DeGardner, Director of Public Services Marty Asleson, Environmental Coordinator Jeff Smyser, City Planner John Powell, City Engineer Mary Kay Wyland, Planning Coordinator FROM: Carri Villella, Building /Community Development Department Secretary . DATE: (atober I, 1999 RE: Environmental Board Recommendations CC: - Environmental Board Members The following is the Environmental Board recommendations for the projects that were on the agenda: Athletic Complex The Environmental Board recommends that the Athletic Complex be implemented in a manner that will not only satisfy the recreation needs of the city, but will also demonstrate good environmental stewardship. This is a superb opportunity for the city to create a complex that works to enhance, rather than degrade, the environment. The Environmental Board would like to work closely with city staff to make this park a demonstration of the environmentally aware nature of our city. Blue Bill Ponds The Environmental Board recommends the following: 1. The design of the development should be modified so as to create a 50 -foot buffer along the eastern edge of the property to protect the significant stand of hardwoods on the adjacent property to the east. 2. Ponds should be designed to infiltrate water on site as much as possible. 3. The city permit flexibility in R -1 zoning standards on street width, lot size, street setback, frontage,. etc... to permit preservation on larger tracts of open space without changing density. 4. Attempts should be made to create an overland storm water treatment train for surface runoff leaving the site. • 5. When restoring vegetation to the site, the Environmental Board recommends the use of native materials, or other plants that require little irrigation or nutrient addition. • • • f..., 6. Property owners be informed that 8 — 10 inches deep tilling of topsoil prior to sod or seeding will improve turf performance. 7. The creation of a buffer of native vegetation around natural and created wetlands. Highland Meadows Re -plat 1. Attempt to create a buffer to preserve stand of oaks on west side of property. 2. City permit flexibility in R -1 zoning standards on street width, lot size, setbacks, frontage...etc to permit preservation of larger tracts of open space without changing density. 3. Project design should attempt to maximize infiltration of storm water on the site and reduce runoff into lakes and naturally occurring wetlands. When runoff into water bodies is unavoidable, storm water should be directed over a vegetated surface via broad swales. The design should attempt to maximize the surface area over which the water tiows. The total linear distance of this storm water treatment train should be at least 100 feet between the storm water detention pond and the destination (ditch, lake, wetland). 4. Before spreading topsoil, the board recommends tilling the soil 8" to 10" deep to maximize the successful establishment of landscaping and minimization of surface runoff due to soil compaction during construction. 5. When restoring vegetation to the site, we recommend use of native materials or other plants that require little irrigation or nutrient addition. Use of exotic, invasive species is strongly discouraged. (Eg. European buckthorn, Norway maple) See City Environmental Coordinator for lists of recommended and non - recommended species. • Arosoms 1- SCHSO SUB 4 N/SQ Oad 12 w • T a. 4 4 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5 r— -AAtf4 - G,TRCET — 6 S - UNTY NWT- t6/10F 4SH, PL-.4F N£P WWry�py�uuo - ' I�1+})s�l�I'r1111 o4 re�� IS�M: \������pp 4 9 ,y OOILOT 4 ©©1m111111 N 13 2 ., 111 iliiiiI11111 11-411 !!!! _ 4 NE iii! AlR PARK NORTH tr IDD wAroi esna ^.na >RE AwAreamica ri,Arumorms. Affig =cm 46111111 'M N IS ADD S -- - 4 NO° LINO LAKES -PK • r; • •a•';•c a •r .9 . W<__ ' •- -- ._.... .- -- 2 1- ::.•Ib•r •e -7 2C a' • A.0 D 1150 6 // PINE. DI T PVC /0 Ids /2 • /9 206 y 3 A00' -- COUNTY STATE AI COUNTY HW r R /6H PLAT N&MBER P3 sUA/sGr• s z eSTATi•S6 $ t4 14 LINO PACK i : • 5 6 LAKE u 6 • :1 s t .6 , r :6 VIEW 2 / :�y U 3. 3337 t. 24 28 2' i1 ! O' • •AA IANE0 ry y 7 6 1 xl Y e • .• tE • • 1 Ai • 16 134 Op+,74-ero.- caosiA• • 17 16/*".— 1T� • r • Aaraa441743,4,., • r )"at • Cc "evd ..o/r • • 3-4)641.1P,-‘11 4 jotaark adas 44..`s• ey,L. • P-40- • ,k411•4:.•••:"...i. ' • ' Z'. I N-.4!%• • - 1 1 • ., , • • • • •••—•■•••••■••-•••• ■■•■• • . L i '• 1, I. • = I. il 1,1 iii..i1L tty• ............... —... _ , .. ._ <,..,-----..... rTLAKE :,.1 f-4 .. ,T. 4l.• Y,1• I, E-, N 1 0I5i 311rg I0 •--, - L-'---;.- t -L-L-.!--.i_-4-4 ..-.`----„..•'-'1' .2 a - _ • ..‘ • 1 ONO- ■••■• • • - •77.7, • S N 0 K � � 8 P 8 8 8 4 W P- m Cr 0 a •1 • • • 300'30.44V 1262.04 � 60 60 N W.` 0 vI ° oA} O 02 I c� s BLUEB/LL LANE 47 -104 112 59 9S 8 9 -& co Y 14 227 1 O8 \ *6. W 6 m be m N . 1.. I1]5 30 MEI 9 50 150 L s WOODDUCK TRA /L a I 4 5 I13 L 0 j 4 8 30 30 1 115 8 100 STREET C 8 BO 80 B 80 _ 50 00 00 c 00 mm om ym r m mm cm mm m�o m m ZZ urn o m 6 0c o� cco N V .r FI z V N P o0 mm w 0 00 x o0 m z0 -1 1 N co 80 BO 80 u0 R e u to to ^' .m Nu 1008.98 N00'33'25 "E 0111111 121 OMEN 2 ;111114 2 0 +O i s* ¢ 1 1 oliF0 oa 1---r--- -- - -1 L _ — L — I _ VIVO 31151V1d AtIVNIVinald • • to *-3 N 2 2 �P = -11 0 • m i p C OLD rc0 z cp Z -((0 cram Ul 'O va) o fD et- V O ti 9 P 8 a 2 r Iz .o r y 'Vi0S3NNIV • { I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 44444 ddONd O O s Q F, oo z z 9 n o n Z N 2 2 z m y > o � A,y 4 z m z n 0 0.0 • • 1 : s II 44444 ddONd O O s Q F, oo z z 9 n o n Z N 2 2 z m y > o � A,y 4 z m z n 0 0.0 • • 0 r- co 1;1 I I 5 8 0 0 3 0 4. **-1 P 2 :1 2 I2 1,4 z 5 2 0 2 I 0 0 2 4. ) 22222 Han 20000 0 :-"'M2d12 L.1 • • • 0 AGENDA ITEM 7E STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 10, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 -72, Consideration of Petition for Public Improvements, West Shadow Lake Drive. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The City received a petition from 32 property owners along West Shadow Lake Drive, north of Birch Street, for a Feasibility Study to install sanitary sewer and water service. The City Council referred to this petition to staff and we were directed to hold a neighborhood meeting to discuss the project. A neighborhood meeting was held in the Community Room on June 15, 2000. 34 residents attended the meeting. At the meeting, the City Engineer presented information relating to the estimated cost and assessments related to installing utilities, and reconstructing the roadway. The basis for most of this information was the detailed study and discussion of this same issue that occurred in 1989- 1991. The conclusion presented to the residents is that the project assessments would likely exceed the benefit to the property owners and that utility service would best be considered as part of a street reconstruction project. It is City Staff's recommendation this petition be denied at this time. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 00 -72, Denying the Petition for Public Improvements along West Shadow Lake Drive. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 00 -72 be adopted. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its • adoption: • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 -72 RESOLUTION DENYING THE REQUEST FOR A REPORT ON PUBLIC IMPROVMENTS TO SERVE WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE. WHEREAS, a request has been received for a report on public improvements consisting of sanitary sewer and water service to serve West Shadow Lake Drive, north of Birch Street, and WHEREAS, the City considers this request for improvements as premature, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The request to prepare a report on public improvements consisting of sanitary sewer and water service to serve West Shadow Lake Drive, north of Birch Street, is denied. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 10th day of July, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on July 10, 2000. Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 7F • STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 10, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 -68, Consideration of Bids, Apollo Drive Phase 4 Improvements VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Bids for the referenced project were opened on May 19, 2000; and were received by the City Council at the May 22, 2000, meeting. The City has 60 days after the bid opening to award the contract otherwise the contractors may withdraw their bids without penalty. 60 days from the bid opening date ends on July 18, 2000. The latest regular City Council meeting for award of the contract, per the specifications, is July 10, 2000. The acquisition of the property for this project was initiated on December 20, 1999, when the City Attorney was authorized to commence eminent domain proceedings. As the City Attorney has stated in recent meetings with the City Council and staff, the right - of -way has not been acquired through preparation of an appraisal and direct negotiation with the property owner. The City can ask the contractor submitting the lowest bid if they will still honor their bid if • awarded at a later date if the property acquisition will be completed in the near future. However, staff has not been informed that this is the case. Also, the schedule included in the Feasibility Report estimated the construction of the improvements would be complete by June 26, 2000. Even if the City Council awarded the contract at the next meeting, we anticipate the construction would not be completed until September. Without control of the property, the City cannot authorize a contractor to proceed with construction and should not award the construction contract. If the City does not award a contract, we will inform the three contractors and return their bid bonds. If the City does not award a contract for this project, the developer may still proceed with the installation of the improvements with the execution of a development agreement acceptable to the City. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 00 -68, rejecting bids for the Apollo Drive Phase 4 project. 3. Delay award of the contract to a future City Council meeting and request an award extension from the low bidder. • RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 — City Staff recommends the bids be rejected for the Apollo Drive Phase 4 project. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 -68 RESOLUTION REJECTING BIDS - APOLLO DRIVE PHASE 4 IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the Apollo Drive Phase 4 project, bids were received, and, WHEREAS, the City does not own or have access to the proposed right -of -way, and WHEREAS, the improvements cannot be constructed by the City without access to the proposed right -of -way, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The bids for this project are hereby rejected. 2. The City Engineer is directed to notify the contractors of the City's decision and return their bid bonds. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 10th day of July, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on July 10, 2000. Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk