My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/28/2000 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2000
>
08/28/2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 11:35:17 AM
Creation date
2/13/2014 9:36:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/28/2000
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Marmon Keystone <br />August 28, 2000 <br />page 3 <br />also are utilities in Apollo Drive, but connections to sanitary sewer there would require <br />tearing up the roadway. It is possible to connect tow ater without digging up the street. <br />The new building will connect to water in Apollo Drive, subject to agreement from <br />Anoka County. The building will connect to sanitary sewer in the 74t'' St. easement on <br />the north. <br />Stormwater management on this site includes a pond shared by the property on the east. <br />This common pond will serve both sites. Grading on this site, the TC Fab site to the east, <br />and the unsold property to the west is interrelated. Because of this, the design and review <br />of these two sites requires coordination. <br />The City Engineer's memo addresses these issues further. <br />• Parking <br />For light manufacturing, our code requires at least one parking space per 2000 sf of gross <br />floor area or one space per employee, whichever is greater. The office area requires 3 <br />spaces plus one space per 200 sf. For the purposes of calculating parking spaces, the <br />ordinance requirement is to use 90% of the gross building area. <br />The total requirement is 48 parking spaces. The plan shows 29, with an area provided for <br />24 more if additional parking is needed. This totals 53. The applicant has stated that <br />previous experience has shown that 29 will be enough. In the interest of reducing <br />unnecessary impervious surface, the "proof of parking" approach is a good alternative. If <br />parking becomes a problem, additional parking will be constructed. <br />• Roads, Access, Circulation <br />Passenger vehicles will use the parking on the east side of the building. A shared <br />driveway provides access to the site on the east. The driveway will be shared by TC Fab <br />and Marmon Keystone. A shared driveway agreement between the two sites will be <br />necessary and staff is recommending that one be submitted for City review as a condition <br />of approval. <br />In reviewing shared driveways, we must consider potential traffic conflicts in the <br />driveway itself. Vehicles leaving the sites come from two directions and mix in the <br />driveway before exiting onto Apollo. The parking drive is 100+ feet back from Apollo <br />Drive. This is adequate and will minimize conflicts. <br />gross <br />area <br />90% <br />code <br />requirement <br />required <br />spaces <br />total footprint <br />19,200 sf <br />office <br />2,048 sf <br />1843 <br />3 plus <br />one space per 200 sf <br />12 <br />mfg/warehouse <br />81,000 sf <br />72,900 <br />one space per 2000 sf <br />36 <br />TOTAL <br />48 <br />The total requirement is 48 parking spaces. The plan shows 29, with an area provided for <br />24 more if additional parking is needed. This totals 53. The applicant has stated that <br />previous experience has shown that 29 will be enough. In the interest of reducing <br />unnecessary impervious surface, the "proof of parking" approach is a good alternative. If <br />parking becomes a problem, additional parking will be constructed. <br />• Roads, Access, Circulation <br />Passenger vehicles will use the parking on the east side of the building. A shared <br />driveway provides access to the site on the east. The driveway will be shared by TC Fab <br />and Marmon Keystone. A shared driveway agreement between the two sites will be <br />necessary and staff is recommending that one be submitted for City review as a condition <br />of approval. <br />In reviewing shared driveways, we must consider potential traffic conflicts in the <br />driveway itself. Vehicles leaving the sites come from two directions and mix in the <br />driveway before exiting onto Apollo. The parking drive is 100+ feet back from Apollo <br />Drive. This is adequate and will minimize conflicts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.