My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/11/2002 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2002
>
12/11/2002 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 10:40:53 AM
Creation date
2/13/2014 10:40:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
12/11/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />December 11, 2002 <br />Page 6 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed <br />District. To date, the City has no information regarding the Watershed District review <br />Greenways. The concept plan illustrates a series of interconnecting eight foot wide <br />bituminous trails. While the inclusion of the trails in considered positive, it would seem <br />appropriate to extend the east/west trail segm ent beneath the power easement to the west <br />to connect to Sunset Road. The acceptability of the trailways in fulfilling the greenway <br />directive of the Comprehensive Plan should be subject to comment and recommendation <br />by the Park Board. <br />Park Dedication. As shown on the Parks/Open Space Plan, a significant portion of the <br />subject property is to be dedicated as public park land. Specifi cally, the concept plan <br />provides 22.5 acres of gross public park la nd, 7.3 acres of which is contiguous upland. <br />The integration of such park areas responds to a specific directive of the Comprehensive <br />Plan of providing a greenway in the area. While the inclusion of such park land is <br />considered positive, an assurance should be made that problems do not result from the <br />combination of private and public park owne rship. Of specific concern is that the <br />primary east/west trailway through the property be available to all park users (regardless <br />of private and public ownership). <br />As a condition of PDO approval, park relate d issues raised by the Park Board should be <br />addressed. <br />Tree Preservation. According to the app licant, a significant amount of existing tree <br />massings in the southern portion of the site are to be preserved. While the existing <br />conditions map identifies generalized tree massi ngs, a specific tree i nventory has not, to <br />date, been submitted. <br />Because the Subdivision Ordinance does not specifically mandate the submission of a <br />tree inventory, the need for such invent ory should be subject to comment and <br />recommendation by the Environmental Board and City Officials. <br />Easements. The subdivision design is responsive to the 90’ electrical easement and 60’ <br />gas easement that traverse the property. As shown on the submitted plan, a trail has been <br />proposed within the electrical easement while airpark hanger s border the gas easement in <br />the southeast corner of the property. <br />As shown on the preliminary plat, drainage and utility easements have been proposed <br />along all property lines and over wetland a nd ponding areas. The acceptability of such <br />easements should be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.