Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota . Proposal to Conduct a Fire Department Analysis 5 <br />7. City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota – Fire Department Study (2012) <br />The City retained Springsted to conduct an organizational review ; encompassing staffing, <br />department leadership structure, intergovernmental part nerships, operational culture, service <br />delivery options and best practices. The study presented recommendations in each area and <br />concluded that although some changes are needed to strengthen the present and future <br />department, the City was receiving excell ent fire service for the level of tax dollars invested. <br />Mr. Bart Fischer , City Administrator <br />City of Falcon Heights <br />2077 W. Larpenteur Avenue <br />Falcon Heights, M innesota 55113 <br />651 -792 -7611 <br /> <br /> <br />II. Proposed M ethods and A pproaches in C onducting this Analysis <br />The consulting team will be responsible for meeting and exceeding all expectations of the City. We <br />understand that the primary analysis topics are to help the City implement a new fire department. In <br />order to accomplish t his objective the following compo nents are essential to Phase I : <br />• Overview of baseline fire service including risk, demand , deployment and response time <br />• Identify different options and models for organizing a fire department <br />• E valuate the one -facility model with a preliminary location on Birch Street <br />• Develop a list of essential needs required to begin a new fire department <br />• Identify pros and cons of combining the police and fire department <br /> <br />We will maintain open communication and create strong partnerships with all City , d epartment an d <br />community members we come in contact with. The City is looking for creative ideas to consider and <br />plan for the future of the Fire Department. In partnership with the City, we will use and apply <br />community demographics and population trends as desired. <br /> <br />The Springsted team will bring an unsurpassed commitment to quality; in fact one of our distinctive <br />qualities is the commitment we have to ensure the success of the analysis . To that end, o ur experience and <br />project approach takes into consideration tw o key variables: process credibility and outcome credibility. <br />Process credibility is the realization to all involved, in particular the elected officials and staff, that the <br />methodology used is credible, reasonable and fair to all concerned. In addition , the information and <br />communication must be transparent, honest and timely. Outcome credibility is the realization that the <br />information and data used to develop the findings and recommendations is comprehensive, complete and <br />applied consistently and appro priately without bias or preference to any particular person, persons or <br />individual agenda. If these two objectives are realized, the recommendations, outcomes and future <br />implementation plans are on a strong foundation. This distinction is unique in our business and is a <br />contributing factor to the benefits and strengths of the Springsted team. <br /> <br />The key to our organizational approach is our project manager, Mr. Unmacht, who has the single - <br />point of responsibility and accountability. Project managers have the responsibility of planning, <br />executing and delivering all products and services requested in accordance with contract terms. <br />As part of management responsibilities, the project manager oversees all work under the contract, <br />provides input on every asp ect of the project and coordinates the various analysis areas.